1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf02899693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atypical micromegakaryocytes, promegakaryoblasts and megakaryoblasts: a critical evaluation by immunohistochemistry, cytochemistry and morphometry of bone marrow trephines in chronic myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Morphometry of CD61+ megakaryopoiesis in the control group of 14 patients following monotherapy with STI571 and classification into different subgroups in accordance with previous studies36 …”
supporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Morphometry of CD61+ megakaryopoiesis in the control group of 14 patients following monotherapy with STI571 and classification into different subgroups in accordance with previous studies36 …”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Regression of the fibre content in the majority, but not all patients, 19,22 accompanied by a normalization of megakaryopoiesis could be related to a direct anti-PDGF receptor effect of this agent. 41 According to our findings derived from morphometry after CD61 immunostaining, there is a significant decline in the quantity of atypical small micromegakaryocytes (size £ 150 lm) characteristic of CML 36,46,47 and the return of a large, normally appearing cell fraction. It should be emphasized that, according to morphometry, not only size and shape (form factor) of megakaryocytes and their nuclei returned to normal features, but the nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio did so also.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…lA), PAS-reactivity was restricted to the more mature, glycogen-containing forms. According to a previously conducted study [39], this difference in staining reactivity reflected the number of very small immature and atypical precursors (pro-and megakaryoblasts). Islets of erythro-and normoblasts were small and dispersed and included relatively few erythroid elements (Fig.…”
Section: Clinical and Histomorphometrical Findingsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In these cases it is absolutely mandatory to restrict the diagnosis of a MDS/CMPD to initial blood and BM examinations at first presentation and any therapy should be explicitly excluded [29,66] . Furthermore, it is important that in BM specimens maturation defects should be recognized in at least two lineages [82] , especially erythropoiesis and megakaryocytes (atypical micromegakaryocytes, abnormal nuclear lobulation, compact nuclei) [83] . Finally, although in the past decade many groups were engaged in the study of risk stratification and prognosis of CIMF patients, a comparison of these data reveals an extreme heterogeneity [84,85] .…”
Section: Chronic Idiopathic Myelofibrosismentioning
confidence: 99%