2020
DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2019-230736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atypical dysphagia with end-stage oesophageal disease 30 years post Angelchik device placement in a 72-year-old man

Abstract: Here we describe an atypical presentation of progressive dysphagia in a 72-year-old man leading to frequent regurgitations over the course of 30 years. Investigations revealed a foreign body ring surrounding the proximal stomach and dilation of the oesophagus proximal to the gastro-oesophageal junction. An Angelchik device was extracted; however, the patient’s rapid deterioration prior to surgery, in addition to his severely dysfunctional oesophagus, required placement of a jejunostomy feeding tube. Device rem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the silicone device is soft, it is likely that dysphagia is caused by scar formation from foreign body reaction at the gastro‐oesophageal junction, in addition to constriction applied by the device. In severe cases, end‐stage pseudo‐achalasia has also been described 7 …”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the silicone device is soft, it is likely that dysphagia is caused by scar formation from foreign body reaction at the gastro‐oesophageal junction, in addition to constriction applied by the device. In severe cases, end‐stage pseudo‐achalasia has also been described 7 …”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In severe cases, end-stage pseudo-achalasia has also been described. 7 Our experience and literature search suggests that surgeons in Australia may yet encounter patients with symptoms arising from an Angelchik device. This case demonstrates oesophageal obstruction due to chronic scar and extrinsic constriction, which can be relieved with removal of the device and release of the offending scar tissue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%