Atypical crossmodal emotional integration in patients with gliomas

Boullay, Viviane Luherne-du; Plaza, Monique; Perrault, A; Laurent, Césari; Chaby, Laurence

doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2014.10.003

Cited by 8 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 84 publications

(117 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Multisensory enhancement is sometimes explored in behavioral studies that use RT by comparing the observed RT distribution to the distribution that is predicted by a ‘race model’ (e.g., Colonius and Diederich, 2006 ). Multisensory integration occurs when the reaction time for bimodal trials is faster than what is predicted by the race model (e.g., Charbonneau et al, 2013 ; Luherne-du Boullay et al, 2014 ). Testing this hypothesis by using RTs in our study was not possible because the RTs were not recorded due to the particular eye-tracking procedure (i.e., forced stimuli exploration over 3 s) and the studied population (i.e., TD children and children with ASD).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…A few studies of young adults have demonstrated that congruent emotional information that is processed via multisensory channels optimizes behavioral responses, which results in enhanced accuracy and a faster response time (RT; see De Gelder and Vroomen, 2000 ; Kreifelts et al, 2007 ; Luherne-du Boullay et al, 2014 ). Multisensory enhancement is sometimes explored in behavioral studies that use RT by comparing the observed RT distribution to the distribution that is predicted by a ‘race model’ (e.g., Colonius and Diederich, 2006 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As described by Luherne-du Boullay et al (2014) , the stimuli used in the present study were categorized as visual, auditory, or bimodal ( Figure 1A ). Visual stimuli consisted of pictures of facial expressions that were obtained from the FACES database ( Ebner et al, 2010 ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Multidimensional Approach to the Study of Emotion Recognition in Autism Spectrum Disorders

et al. 2015

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although deficits in emotion recognition have been widely reported in autism spectrum disorder (ASD), experiments have been restricted to either facial or vocal expressions. Here, we explored multimodal emotion processing in children with ASD ( N = 19) and with typical development (TD, N = 19), considering uni (faces and voices) and multimodal (faces/voices simultaneously) stimuli and developmental comorbidities (neuro-visual, language and motor impairments). Compared to TD controls, children with ASD had rather high and heterogeneous emotion recognition scores but showed also several significant differences: lower emotion recognition scores for visual stimuli, for neutral emotion, and a greater number of saccades during visual task. Multivariate analyses showed that: (1) the difficulties they experienced with visual stimuli were partially alleviated with multimodal stimuli. (2) Developmental age was significantly associated with emotion recognition in TD children, whereas it was the case only for the multimodal task in children with ASD. (3) Language impairments tended to be associated with emotion recognition scores of ASD children in the auditory modality. Conversely, in the visual or bimodal (visuo-auditory) tasks, the impact of developmental coordination disorder or neuro-visual impairments was not found. We conclude that impaired emotion processing constitutes a dimension to explore in the field of ASD, as research has the potential to define more homogeneous subgroups and tailored interventions. However, it is clear that developmental age, the nature of the stimuli, and other developmental comorbidities must also be taken into account when studying this dimension.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Multidimensional Approach to the Study of Emotion Recognition in Autism Spectrum Disorders

et al. 2015

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Evidence supporting this idea includes studies of brain-damaged patients, such as traumatic or vascular brain injuries and brain tumors. These studies found similar impairments in processing emotions from faces and voices in a single modality, but found that brain-damaged patients experienced greater performance using both facial and vocal stimuli (e.g., Hornak et al, 1996 ; Borod et al, 1998 ; Calder et al, 2001 ; Kucharska-Pietura et al, 2003 ; du Boullay et al, 2013 ; Luherne-du Boullay et al, 2014 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 87%

Compensating for age limits through emotional crossmodal integration

et al. 2015

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social interactions in daily life necessitate the integration of social signals from different sensory modalities. In the aging literature, it is well established that the recognition of emotion in facial expressions declines with advancing age, and this also occurs with vocal expressions. By contrast, crossmodal integration processing in healthy aging individuals is less documented. Here, we investigated the age-related effects on emotion recognition when faces and voices were presented alone or simultaneously, allowing for crossmodal integration. In this study, 31 young adults (M = 25.8 years) and 31 older adults (M = 67.2 years) were instructed to identify several basic emotions (happiness, sadness, anger, fear, disgust) and a neutral expression, which were displayed as visual (facial expressions), auditory (non-verbal affective vocalizations) or crossmodal (simultaneous, congruent facial and vocal affective expressions) stimuli. The results showed that older adults performed slower and worse than younger adults at recognizing negative emotions from isolated faces and voices. In the crossmodal condition, although slower, older adults were as accurate as younger except for anger. Importantly, additional analyses using the “race model” demonstrate that older adults benefited to the same extent as younger adults from the combination of facial and vocal emotional stimuli. These results help explain some conflicting results in the literature and may clarify emotional abilities related to daily life that are partially spared among older adults.

show abstract

“…Facial expressions recognition has been investigated in numerous studies, showing that many variables can influence the interpretation of FEs: (i) FE recognition increases during childhood with the age of the perceiver ( Herba et al, 2006 ; Lawrence et al, 2015 ) and declines for older adults compared to young adults (see Ruffman et al, 2008 ). (ii) Modality influences emotion recognition, and multimodal supports are easier to recognize than unimodal supports ( Castellano et al, 2008 ; Luherne-du Boullay et al, 2014 ). (iii) The condition of presentation from static or dynamic support is also important ( Biele and Grabowska, 2006 ; Trautmann et al, 2009 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Children Facial Expression Production: Influence of Age, Gender, Emotion Subtype, Elicitation Condition and Culture

et al. 2018

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The production of facial expressions (FEs) is an important skill that allows children to share and adapt emotions with their relatives and peers during social interactions. These skills are impaired in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. However, the way in which typical children develop and master their production of FEs has still not been clearly assessed. This study aimed to explore factors that could influence the production of FEs in childhood such as age, gender, emotion subtype (sadness, anger, joy, and neutral), elicitation task (on request, imitation), area of recruitment (French Riviera and Parisian) and emotion multimodality. A total of one hundred fifty-seven children aged 6–11 years were enrolled in Nice and Paris, France. We asked them to produce FEs in two different tasks: imitation with an avatar model and production on request without a model. Results from a multivariate analysis revealed that: (1) children performed better with age. (2) Positive emotions were easier to produce than negative emotions. (3) Children produced better FE on request (as opposed to imitation); and (4) Riviera children performed better than Parisian children suggesting regional influences on emotion production. We conclude that facial emotion production is a complex developmental process influenced by several factors that needs to be acknowledged in future research.

show abstract

Atypical crossmodal emotional integration in patients with gliomas

Cited by 8 publications

References 84 publications

A Multidimensional Approach to the Study of Emotion Recognition in Autism Spectrum Disorders

A Multidimensional Approach to the Study of Emotion Recognition in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Compensating for age limits through emotional crossmodal integration

Children Facial Expression Production: Influence of Age, Gender, Emotion Subtype, Elicitation Condition and Culture

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About