2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atypical advanced interatrial blocks: Definition and electrocardiographic recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
36
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…P-wave morphology was assessed by observation of the inferior leads (II, III, and aVF). 13 , 14 Interatrial block (IAB) was defined as bimodal (positive/negative) P-wave morphology with an initial upward deviation from the baseline and a final downward deviation towards the baseline ( Supplementary material online , Figure S2 ). Normal atrial conduction was considered as a P-wave duration of 120 ms regardless of morphology; partial IAB was defined as a P-wave ≥120 ms without bimodal morphology; and advanced IAB was defined as a P-wave ≥120 ms with bimodal morphology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P-wave morphology was assessed by observation of the inferior leads (II, III, and aVF). 13 , 14 Interatrial block (IAB) was defined as bimodal (positive/negative) P-wave morphology with an initial upward deviation from the baseline and a final downward deviation towards the baseline ( Supplementary material online , Figure S2 ). Normal atrial conduction was considered as a P-wave duration of 120 ms regardless of morphology; partial IAB was defined as a P-wave ≥120 ms without bimodal morphology; and advanced IAB was defined as a P-wave ≥120 ms with bimodal morphology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P waves showed increased duration (>120 ms). The polarity of the P wave in lead III and aVF was biphasic (positive-negative) consistent with aIAB (3,4). In lead II, the P wave showed a triphasic pattern (positive-negative-positive), which just recently was defined as atypical aIAB (3).…”
Section: Ecg Description and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were classified as having either no IAB (PWD < 120 ms), pIAB (PWD ≥120 ms, positive P waves in leads II and aVF) or aIAB (PWD 120 ms and biphasic [±] or negative P waves in leads II or aVF). The definition [13] was established on the notion that aIAB diagnosis should primarily be based on leads II and aVF and that isolated abnormal morphologies in lead III are not sufficiently specific for aIAB [19]. Illustrations of the different IAB types are found in Figure 1.…”
Section: Baseline Ecg Assessment and Definitions Of Iab And Abnormal mentioning
confidence: 99%