Attrition in Web-Based Treatment for Problem Drinkers

Abstract

BackgroundWeb-based interventions for problem drinking are effective but characterized by high rates of attrition. There is a need to better understand attrition rates in order to improve the completion rates and the success of Web-based treatment programs.ObjectiveThe objectives of our study were to (1) examine attrition prevalence and pretreatment predictors of attrition in a sample of open-access users of a Web-based program for problem drinkers, and (2) to further explore attrition data from our randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the Web-based program.MethodsAttrition data from two groups of Dutch-speaking problem drinkers were collected: (1) open-access participants enrolled in the program in 2009 (n = 885), and (2) RCT participants (n = 156). Participants were classified as noncompleters if they did not complete all 12 treatment sessions (9 assignments and 3 assessments). In both samples we assessed prevalence of attrition and pretreatment predictors of treatment completion. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore predictors of treatment completion. In the RCT sample, we additionally measured reasons for noncompletion and participants’ suggestions to enhance treatment adherence. The qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis.ResultsThe open-access and RCT group differed significantly in the percentage of treatment completers (273/780, 35.0% vs 65/144, 45%, χ2 1 = 5.4, P = .02). Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant contribution of treatment readiness, gender, education level, age, baseline alcohol consumption, and readiness to change to predict treatment completion. The key reasons for noncompletion were personal reasons, dissatisfaction with the intervention, and satisfaction with their own improvement. The main suggestions for boosting strategies involved email notification and more flexibility in the intervention.ConclusionsThe challenge of Web-based alcohol treatment programs no longer seems to be their effectiveness but keeping participants involved until the end of the treatment program. Further research should investigate whether the suggested strategies to improve adherence decrease attrition rates in Web-based interventions. If we can succeed in improving attrition rates, the success of Web-based alcohol interventions will also improve and, as a consequence, their public health impact will increase.TrialInternational Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 39104853; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN39104853 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/63IKDul1T)

Randomized Trial on Mindfulness Training for Smokers Targeted to a Disadvantaged Population

“…As a study designed to test acceptability in disadvantaged smokers, it was expected that attrition rates would be high. Attrition rates for this study are similar to other interventions on disadvantaged populations (Frack et al, 1997; Goldade et al, 2011; Matthews et al, 2006; Postel et al, 2011; Zeller et al, 2004). Future studies on mindfulness-based smoking interventions could benefit in terms of statistical power from recruitment of less disadvantaged populations and potential of exclusion of smokers who have temporary housing, no cell phones, or who have limited means of transportation.…”

Constructing a Theory- and Evidence-Based Treatment Rationale for Complex eHealth Interventions: Development of an Online Alcohol Intervention Using an Intervention Mapping Approach

“…Rather than counting how many people drop out before the end of treatment, we think it is more important to focus on the number of sessions completed, and by whom (in combination with reach and effectiveness). Therefore, our conclusions differ slightly from the conclusion of Postel [111]. The criterion for success in eHealth is not to keep participants until the end of treatment, but to keep them long enough to achieve a clinically significant effect on the relevant health behavior.…”

“…For example, in a sample of problem drinkers, enrolled in a 12 session Web-based intervention, a dropout rate of 45% was reported, and the authors concluded that “the challenge of Web-based alcohol treatment programs no longer seems to be their effectiveness but keeping participants involved until the end of the treatment program” [111]. In terms of number of sessions (73) the current intervention is probably the most comprehensive of its class [20-22].…”

Alcohol Electronic Screening and Brief Intervention

“…Attrition rates tend to be high in e-health studies, 76 including studies evaluating the effectiveness of e-SBI for reducing excessive drinking. 77 To address this problem, many studies conducted intent-to-treat analyses (i.e., applying non-completers baseline data at follow-up), with results that were similar to participants who were retained. Lastly, this review synthesizes literature that was published by October of 2011, consistent with the evidence available when e-SBI was presented to the Task Force.…”