2002
DOI: 10.1080/14623730.2002.9721856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attrition in a Longitudinal Drug Abuse Prevention Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Tracked intervention participants (Weekly X = .11, SD = .02; Monthly X = .13, SD = .03) did not demonstrate significant differences in marijuana use compared to non-tracked intervention participants (Weekly X = .13, SD = .02; Monthly X = .16, SD = .03). Baseline differences in marijuana use by tracked versus non-tracked participants is a finding consistent with other long-term drug use survey studies (e.g., Newcomb, 1997; Orlando et al, 2005; Sun et al, 2006) and reported previously for earlier waves on our study (Fan et al, 2002), although such differences have not been typically found by intervention and control groups.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tracked intervention participants (Weekly X = .11, SD = .02; Monthly X = .13, SD = .03) did not demonstrate significant differences in marijuana use compared to non-tracked intervention participants (Weekly X = .13, SD = .02; Monthly X = .16, SD = .03). Baseline differences in marijuana use by tracked versus non-tracked participants is a finding consistent with other long-term drug use survey studies (e.g., Newcomb, 1997; Orlando et al, 2005; Sun et al, 2006) and reported previously for earlier waves on our study (Fan et al, 2002), although such differences have not been typically found by intervention and control groups.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Fan et al, 2002). For this study, analyses of attrition and missingness were conducted at critical points in our evaluation design.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge this is the first study to monitor participants for 16 years to assess the relationship between early adolescent weekly smoking trajectories and adult nicotine dependence, but 37% of the original sample was lost to design or attrition. Previously, we showed that smokers were more likely than nonsmokers to be missing from measurements over time, although we found no effects of program6missing status on smoking or drug use (Fan, Pentz, Dwyer, Bernstein, & Li, 2002). Thus, trajectories, especially the early stable user trajectory, may be slightly underestimated.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…The missing rate and the missing rate by drug use status did not differ between intervention and control groups. 27 Multiple imputation was performed using Mplus (Version 6.11). Missing data were imputed from a variance covariance model, where all variables in the data set were assumed to be dependent variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%