1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf01544608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attribution of gender to a gender-unspecified individual: An evaluation of the people = male hypothesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
46
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
46
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…But the Biphobia Scale itself is limited in that the items specify attitudes toward''a bisexual individual. ''Since studies of gender-neutral language indicate that when gender is unspecified, participants assume maleness (Hamilton, 1991;Merritt & Kok, 1995), it is probable that the Biphobia Scale has inadvertently assessed attitudes toward bisexual men. The Biphobia Scale was chosen for use in the present study due to its greater range of items, but modification of the scale (to specify gender of the bisexual) was undertaken in order to explore our research questions.…”
Section: Biphobia and Binegativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the Biphobia Scale itself is limited in that the items specify attitudes toward''a bisexual individual. ''Since studies of gender-neutral language indicate that when gender is unspecified, participants assume maleness (Hamilton, 1991;Merritt & Kok, 1995), it is probable that the Biphobia Scale has inadvertently assessed attitudes toward bisexual men. The Biphobia Scale was chosen for use in the present study due to its greater range of items, but modification of the scale (to specify gender of the bisexual) was undertaken in order to explore our research questions.…”
Section: Biphobia and Binegativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence to suggest a 'people-as-male' bias, however, in that people attribute to gender-unspecified targets characteristics that are more similar to men than to women. For example, participants perceived a gender-ambiguous target as less caring, less cheerful, and less feminine than an explicitly female target (McKelvie and Waterhouse 2005; Merrit and Kok 1995). These findings lead us to believe that evaluations of a gender-ambiguous applicant will be most similar to those of a male applicant.…”
Section: Gender-ambiguous Applicantsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…One study by Merrit and Kok (1995) found that the perceived gender of a gender-unspecified target was not related to scores on the Bem Sex Role Inventory. There is evidence to suggest a 'people-as-male' bias, however, in that people attribute to gender-unspecified targets characteristics that are more similar to men than to women.…”
Section: Gender-ambiguous Applicantsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…If this is the case for children as well, when gender-neutral contexts are involved, it may lead boys to inflect verbs in the male direction and girls to inflect verbs in the female direction. Second, gender-neutral contexts may be resolved by the application of what has been dubbed the Male as Default heuristic, a default which leads to the attribution of maleness rather than femaleness to others, barring the availability of contradictory information (e.g., Hamilton 1991;Merritt and Kok 1995). For instance, Hamilton found that a typical person with a typical name was more often thought of as male than as female.…”
Section: Hebrew and Gendermentioning
confidence: 97%