Attributes of excellent clinician teachers and barriers to recognizing and rewarding clinician teachers’ performances and achievements: a narrative review

Abstract

Background: Over the last 31 years, there have been several institutional efforts to better recognize and reward clinician teachers. However, the perception of inadequate recognition and rewards by clinician teachers for their clinical teaching performance and achievements remains. The objective of this narrative review is two-fold: deepen understanding of the attributes of excellent clinician teachers considered for recognition and reward decisions and identify the barriers clinician teachers face in receiving recognition and rewards. Methods: We searched OVID Medline, Embase, Education Source and Web of Science to identify relevant papers published between 1990 and 2020. After screening for eligibility, we conducted a content analysis of the findings from 43 relevant papers to identify key trends and issues in the literature. Results: We found the majority of relevant papers from the US context, a paucity of relevant papers from the Canadian context, and a declining international focus on the attributes of excellent clinician teachers and barriers to the recognition and rewarding of clinician teachers since 2010. ‘Provides feedback’, ‘excellent communication skills’, ‘good supervision’, and ‘organizational skills’ were common cognitive attributes considered for recognition and rewards. ‘Stimulates’, ‘passionate and enthusiastic’, and ‘creates supportive environment’, were common non-cognitive attributes considered for recognition and rewards. The devaluation of teaching, unclear criteria, and unreliable metrics were the main barriers to the recognition and rewarding of clinician teachers. Conclusions: The findings of our narrative review highlight a need for local empirical research on recognition and reward issues to better inform local, context-specific reforms to policies and practices.

Benefits of a near-peer program from the tutors’ perspective: a survey of Australian junior doctors in a regional teaching program

“…Nonetheless, it is bene cial that our respondents reported the most signi cant improvements in their communication skills and their ability to engage in feedback conversations after involvement with the NPMT. These qualities have been identi ed amongst the common attributes recognised as contributing to excellent clinical teaching alongside 'good supervision skills' and 'organisational skills' (37). An interesting parallel can be drawn to an Italian study of anatomy tutors, where communication skills was ranked highest and technical skills were ranked last in self-perceived improvement, in alignment with our ndings (11).…”

Prioritizing Clinical Teaching Excellence: A Hidden Curriculum Problem

“…29 This has been suggested to be a key driver of the inequity in recognition and reward for teaching compared with competing domains. 13,29,47,48 For an in-depth analysis of barriers to the recognition and rewarding of clinical teachers, please see a recent review by Fantaye et al 49 Clinical teachers can experience inequities particular to the clinical settings of AMCs in which they are required to teach and provide clinical care.…”

Clinical nursing mentors’ motivation, attitude, and practice for mentoring and factors associated with them

“…An objective statement to enhance clinical practice is to emphasize the potential benefits of mentoring, such as the development of relationships and the discovery of talent [ 21 , 22 ]. Institutions could provide resources and support to help mentors effectively manage their time, thus ensuring that mentoring does not become overly burdensome [ 23 , 24 ].…”