2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00357-018-9278-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attribute Hierarchy Models in Cognitive Diagnosis: Identifiability of the Latent Attribute Space and Conditions for Completeness of the Q-Matrix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Characterizations of the identifiability of AHMs as well as general attribute structure models are provided in Section 6. This generalizes a recently published result on the identifiability of AHMs by Cai et al (2018), and corrects a false theorem by Köhn and Chiu (2018). While proofs are formulated within the KST framework, results are immediately recasted in CDM terms.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Characterizations of the identifiability of AHMs as well as general attribute structure models are provided in Section 6. This generalizes a recently published result on the identifiability of AHMs by Cai et al (2018), and corrects a false theorem by Köhn and Chiu (2018). While proofs are formulated within the KST framework, results are immediately recasted in CDM terms.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In other words, a Q-matrix is complete if and only if it contains the (k × k) identity matrix as a submatrix, with k the number of attributes. In recently published papers Cai et al (2018) and Köhn and Chiu (2018) independently claim that they have generalized this result to attribute hierarchies (as suggested by Leighton et al (2004)). The following formulation restates the claim within the terminology introduced above.…”
Section: Attribute Hierarchy Modelsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations