2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2017.404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attribute-Enhanced Face Recognition with Neural Tensor Fusion Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Description 2001 Heckathorn et al [100] First study demonstrating effectiveness of soft biometrics for recognition 2004 Jain et al [93] Bayes rule based model for fingerprint recognition with soft and hard biometrics 2004 Zewail et al [102] Utilized iris color for performing multimodal recognition of fingerprint and iris 2004 Jain et al [103] Utilized gender, height, and ethnicity for fingerprint and face identification 2006 Ailisto et al [104] Incorporated weight and fat percentage for performing fingerprint recognition 2009 Marcialis et al [105] Proposed minority groups to reduce the false rejection rate using soft biometrics 2009 Abreu et al [106] Feature selection using soft biometrics 2010 Moustakas et al [107] User height and stride for supplementing gait recognition 2010 Park and Jain [108] Combined facial marks with an existing face recognition algorithm 2010 Guo et al [101] Analyzed effect of race, gender, height, and weight for cross-age recognition 2011 Scheirer et al [109] Bayesian Attribute Networks for using descriptive attributes for face recognition 2011 Abreu et al [110] Proposed three methods for fusing soft biometric information with primary biometrics 2014 Tome et al [111] Evaluated effect of soft biometrics for recognition from a distance 2015 Tome et al [112] Fusion of continuous and discrete soft biometric traits for face recognition 2017 Mittal et al [113] Utilized soft biometrics for re-ordering the rank list of a face recognition model 2017 Hu et al [114] Tensor-based fusion of face recognition features and face attribute features 2017 Schumann and Stiefelhagen [115] Weighted fusion of attribute prediction and face features for person re-identification 2018 Kazemi et al [116] Attribute centered loss for CNNs: match digital faces with sketch-attribute pairs 2018 Liu et al [117] Attribute guided triplet loss for heterogeneous face matching tion for supplementing gait recognition. A probabilistic framework was used for this purpose.…”
Section: Year Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Description 2001 Heckathorn et al [100] First study demonstrating effectiveness of soft biometrics for recognition 2004 Jain et al [93] Bayes rule based model for fingerprint recognition with soft and hard biometrics 2004 Zewail et al [102] Utilized iris color for performing multimodal recognition of fingerprint and iris 2004 Jain et al [103] Utilized gender, height, and ethnicity for fingerprint and face identification 2006 Ailisto et al [104] Incorporated weight and fat percentage for performing fingerprint recognition 2009 Marcialis et al [105] Proposed minority groups to reduce the false rejection rate using soft biometrics 2009 Abreu et al [106] Feature selection using soft biometrics 2010 Moustakas et al [107] User height and stride for supplementing gait recognition 2010 Park and Jain [108] Combined facial marks with an existing face recognition algorithm 2010 Guo et al [101] Analyzed effect of race, gender, height, and weight for cross-age recognition 2011 Scheirer et al [109] Bayesian Attribute Networks for using descriptive attributes for face recognition 2011 Abreu et al [110] Proposed three methods for fusing soft biometric information with primary biometrics 2014 Tome et al [111] Evaluated effect of soft biometrics for recognition from a distance 2015 Tome et al [112] Fusion of continuous and discrete soft biometric traits for face recognition 2017 Mittal et al [113] Utilized soft biometrics for re-ordering the rank list of a face recognition model 2017 Hu et al [114] Tensor-based fusion of face recognition features and face attribute features 2017 Schumann and Stiefelhagen [115] Weighted fusion of attribute prediction and face features for person re-identification 2018 Kazemi et al [116] Attribute centered loss for CNNs: match digital faces with sketch-attribute pairs 2018 Liu et al [117] Attribute guided triplet loss for heterogeneous face matching tion for supplementing gait recognition. A probabilistic framework was used for this purpose.…”
Section: Year Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The availability of large-scale datasets with attribute information has further facilitated research in this direction [119]. Hu et al [114] proposed a tensorfusion based framework for combining face recognition and face attribute features, resulting in a Gated Two-stream Neural Network. Schumann and Stiefelhagen [115] proposed learning attribute-complementary features for person re-identification.…”
Section: Year Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One related work [33] is to exploit CNN based attribute features for authentication on mobile devices, and the facial attributes are trained by a multi-task, partly based Deep Convolutional Neural Network architecture. Hu et.al [11] systematically study the problem of how to fuse face recognition features and facial attribute features to enhance face recognition performance. They reformulate feature fusion as a gated two-stream neural network, which can be efficiently optimized by neural network learning.…”
Section: Face Recognition With Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past few years, labeled image datasets have played a critical role in high-level image understanding [Simonyan, 2007;Min, 2016;Zhao, 2018;Zhang, 2017;Xie, 2019;Shu, 2018;Wang, 2015;Hu, 2017;Hua, 2017;Liu, 2018;Huang, 2018;Xu, 2017]. However, the process of constructing manually labeled datasets is both time-consuming and labor-intensive [Deng, 2009].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the process of constructing manually labeled datasets is both time-consuming and labor-intensive [Deng, 2009]. To reduce the time and labor cost of manual annotation, learning directly from the web images has attracted more and more attention [Chen, 2013;Yao, 2018;Shen, 2019;Zhang, 2016;Yao, 2019;Liu, 2019;Tang, 2018;Hua, 2017;Xu, 2016;Yang, 2019;Hua, 2016]. Compared to manually-labeled image datasets, web images are a rich and free resource.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%