2003
DOI: 10.1063/1.1603223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attractive and repulsive interactions in the inelastic scattering of NO by Ar: A comparison between classical trajectory and close-coupling quantum mechanical results

Abstract: State-resolved differential cross sections for the rotationally inelastic scattering of the Ar+NO system have been derived from quasiclassical trajectories and quantum close-coupling calculations on a recent ab initio potential energy surface at the collision energy of a recent high resolution experiment (66 meV). Globally good agreement is obtained between the theoretical predictions and experimental results, although some of the experimental details are not reproduced in the classical calculation. The role o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 one can see that for ⌬J Ͼ 2 the Fraunhofer model yields an integral cross section which is significantly smaller than the one obtained from a close-coupling calculation. This is supported by the work of Aoiz et al, 28 who…”
Section: B Results For Ar-no"supporting
confidence: 61%
“…11 one can see that for ⌬J Ͼ 2 the Fraunhofer model yields an integral cross section which is significantly smaller than the one obtained from a close-coupling calculation. This is supported by the work of Aoiz et al, 28 who…”
Section: B Results For Ar-no"supporting
confidence: 61%
“…In our previous studies of elastic depolarization of OH(X 2 Å) in collisions with Ar and He [17,18], we found it useful to examine J-dependent partial cross-sections, as is often done for state-to-state inelastic integral cross-sections (see, for example, [55]). The state-to-state tensor crosssection defined in (1) can be written as We have introduced in (4) 'partial tensor cross-sections', which are defined as…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity of this approximation was established in former studies. 38 It is worth mentioning that the Gaussian binning procedure [39][40][41] should not be used for inelastic scattering calculations. In fact, it proved to be inadequate for the assignment of vibrational states in inelastic trajectories of the present system leading to unrealistic results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 resemble those found in the context of rotational excitation and rainbow scattering studies. 38,42 However, there are important differences between the dynamics of the Cl + H 2 inelastic collisions and those corresponding to simpler collisions implying only RET (Ref. 38), as can be appreciated in the classical deflection functions of inelastic scattering presented in Fig.…”
Section: Inelastic Icssmentioning
confidence: 95%