2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10886-011-9998-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attraction of the Redbay Ambrosia Beetle, Xyleborus glabratus, to Avocado, Lychee, and Essential Oil Lures

Abstract: The redbay ambrosia beetle, Xyleborus glabratus Eichhoff, is an exotic wood-boring insect that vectors the mycopathogen responsible for laurel wilt, a lethal vascular disease of trees in the Lauraceae. High mortality has occurred in native Persea species in the southeastern U.S., and the vector-pathogen complex poses an imminent threat to the production of commercial avocado, P. americana, in south Florida. There is a critical need for effective attractants to detect, monitor, and control this invasive pest. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
65
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(20 reference statements)
2
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and Forst., Myrtaceae) and phoebe oil (extracted from the Brazilian walnut tree, Phoebe porosa Mex., Lauraceae) [14]. Field evaluations conducted in Florida found phoebe oil lures to be highly attractive to RAB, with a field life of 2 -3 months [15,16], but unfortunately phoebe oil is no longer available commercially. Manuka oil lures were found to be attractive initially, but the lures lost efficacy after 2 -3 weeks due to rapid loss of sesquiterpenes [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Forst., Myrtaceae) and phoebe oil (extracted from the Brazilian walnut tree, Phoebe porosa Mex., Lauraceae) [14]. Field evaluations conducted in Florida found phoebe oil lures to be highly attractive to RAB, with a field life of 2 -3 months [15,16], but unfortunately phoebe oil is no longer available commercially. Manuka oil lures were found to be attractive initially, but the lures lost efficacy after 2 -3 weeks due to rapid loss of sesquiterpenes [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, 14 ambrosia beetle species have been detected on avocado, and the mycangial mycofloras of the most common species on avocado, redbay and swampbay have been assessed (33,34,64,82; Pena et al, unpublished; Ploetz et al, unpublished). Raffaelea lauricola has been isolated from eight ambrosia beetles, in addition to X. glabratus (34,130, Campbell et al, unpublished).…”
Section: Systemic and Lethal Damage Caused By An Ambrosia Beetle Symbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other trees in the Magnoliaceae, Fabaceae, Fagaceae and Sapindaceae were less attractive or not attractive to the insect (62, 111, 112). α-copaene was identified as an important semiochemical attractant in lauraceous hosts, as well as the non-host lychee (Litchi sinensis, Sapindaceae) in which the beetle did not establish (82,83,121). Avocado seems to be a less preferred host for X. glabratus than other members of the Lauraceae.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ambrosia fungi did not evolve to be pathogenic, and the mechanisms underlying the diseases caused by these fungi are only beginning to be understood. One intriguing explanation is that tree death is not caused by virulence factors from the fungus, but by an exaggerated response of naive tree tissues to a novel threat, resulting in tree suicide [66,67]. This 'exaggerated response' hypothesis posits that tree hosts in the native range have evolved an appropriately mild immune response to non-pathogenic ambrosia fungi, but such fine-tuning of response has never occurred in regions lacking such fungi.…”
Section: Hypothetical Framework For Understanding Pathogenicity Of Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the lethal effect to trees in both cases appears to be the tree's over-expressed expansion of walls in xylem vessels. This normally prevents a disease from spreading in a tree, except that in the cases of overreaction, tree kills itself ( [67], R. C. Ploetz & J. A. Smith 2010, personal communication).…”
Section: Hypothetical Framework For Understanding Pathogenicity Of Thmentioning
confidence: 99%