2018
DOI: 10.1080/2331186x.2017.1422679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudinal instrument development: Assessing cognitive, affective, and behavioral domains of teacher attitudes toward teaching all students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial scale comprised 35 items distributed on 4 dimensions, consistent with the ethical attitude model towards the use of information technology (IT). For the needs factor associated with the cognitive component, in Dimension 1, 17 items were developed, of which items CN1, CN2, CN7 were adapted after Sondhi [77], the item CN5 after Gregory and Noto [78], the CN6 item after Pérez-Rodríguez et al [79], items CN9, CN10, CN11, CN12, CN13, CN14, CN15, CN16, CN17 after Hashim and Hassan [80], and items CN3, CN4, CN8 are original. For the constraints factor associated with the cognitive component, within dimension 2, 6 items were developed, of which all items CC1, CC2, CC3, CC4, CC5, and CC6 are original.…”
Section: The Survey Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial scale comprised 35 items distributed on 4 dimensions, consistent with the ethical attitude model towards the use of information technology (IT). For the needs factor associated with the cognitive component, in Dimension 1, 17 items were developed, of which items CN1, CN2, CN7 were adapted after Sondhi [77], the item CN5 after Gregory and Noto [78], the CN6 item after Pérez-Rodríguez et al [79], items CN9, CN10, CN11, CN12, CN13, CN14, CN15, CN16, CN17 after Hashim and Hassan [80], and items CN3, CN4, CN8 are original. For the constraints factor associated with the cognitive component, within dimension 2, 6 items were developed, of which all items CC1, CC2, CC3, CC4, CC5, and CC6 are original.…”
Section: The Survey Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research that was conducted by Paidi et al [20] and also Großschedl, Mahler, and Harms [21] strengthen statements about the evaluation instrument items development in the cognitive domain. The research that was conducted by Gregory and Noto [22] strengthens statements about the development of valid and reliable instruments item to evaluate the affective and cognitive domains.…”
Section: Final Itemsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The full description of the cross-tabulation process can be seen in Table 6. 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,27,28,29,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,…”
Section: Trial Of Tri Kaya Parisudha-based Countenance Evaluation Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boyle et al (2013) specifically found that teachers reported more positive attitudes when they received the necessary training required to work with students with disabilities. Although many pre-service educators improve their inclusive attitudes after exposure to distinct preparation programs (Rosenzweig, 2009), these programs have continued to face ongoing scrutiny regarding whether their pre-service teachers and graduates are adequately prepared to meet the needs of the increasingly diverse classroom (Gregory & Noto, 2018).…”
Section: Background/literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Educators" attitudes towards teaching students with disabilities are an important aspect of inclusion because if teachers are not accepting of the process, then their commitment to ensuring it is implemented successfully may be compromised (Ernst & Rogers, 2009;Schmidt & Vrhovnik, 2015). Gregory and Noto (2018) remind us that "despite their entry into the physical space of general education classrooms and the expected instruction of the core academic standards, students with disabilities may still be excluded" (p. 1). Although many variables may affect schools" and districts" abilities to successfully implement educational initiatives, numerous studies (Boyle et al, 2013;de Boer et al, 2011;Galaterou & Antoniou, 2017;Kimble, 2017;van Reusen et al, 2001;Wilson, 2014) have shed light on the impact teacher attitude has on inclusive educational practices.…”
Section: Background/literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%