2019
DOI: 10.1111/josi.12318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes towards Trump Policies and Climate Change: The Key Roles of Aversion to Wealth Redistribution and Political Interest

Abstract: Both psychological and political science researchers have pointed out that Trump policies embrace right wing and authoritarian dispositions. In turn, such dispositions have been related to climate change denial and aversion to wealth redistribution. Nevertheless, little is known about the mechanisms underlying the relationship between individuals' favorable attitude towards Trump and climate change skepticism. We aimed to understand two cruxes in this relationship: (i) whether the favorable attitude towards Tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(57 reference statements)
4
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If we turn to environmental policies, similarly to welfare state functioning, also here the state guarantees that specific policy objectives must be reached and hence moderates the environmental outcomes. At the global level, since the Rio United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in 1992, environmental policy was at the heart of the policy agenda [31]-although from time to time highly contested, as by the Trump Presidency, supported by his voters, has clearly shown in a recent piece of research [32]. The recent movement "Fridays for Future" has further put into the political agenda the need to limit climate change via a world mobilization on 15 March, 2019 which was particularly intensively participated [33], and we might even expect environmental interest groups to develop a similarly important role as the workers' movement had in the development of the welfare state.…”
Section: Worlds Of Eco-welfare States?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we turn to environmental policies, similarly to welfare state functioning, also here the state guarantees that specific policy objectives must be reached and hence moderates the environmental outcomes. At the global level, since the Rio United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in 1992, environmental policy was at the heart of the policy agenda [31]-although from time to time highly contested, as by the Trump Presidency, supported by his voters, has clearly shown in a recent piece of research [32]. The recent movement "Fridays for Future" has further put into the political agenda the need to limit climate change via a world mobilization on 15 March, 2019 which was particularly intensively participated [33], and we might even expect environmental interest groups to develop a similarly important role as the workers' movement had in the development of the welfare state.…”
Section: Worlds Of Eco-welfare States?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, politically engaged Americans who have a favorable attitude toward Donald Trump are inclined to deny the reality of climate change. This relationship is mediated in part by a component belief in neoliberalism: aversion to wealth redistribution (Panno, Leone, & Carrus, ). That is, Americans may favor Trump because of his right‐wing neoliberal loathing of wealth redistribution.…”
Section: Cognitive Availability Of Neoliberal Beliefsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental psychological studies dedicated a great deal of theory and research in the past to understand the social and cognitive processes at the basis of ecological behaviors and sustainable choices in everyday life among "laypeople, " with significant achievements (e.g., Klöckner, 2013;Kaiser et al, 2014;Steg, 2016;Carrus et al, 2018;Evans et al, 2018;Panno et al, 2019). However, an interesting, yet still under investigated issue in this domain is related to the decision making and social cognitive processes of representatives of formal social units, such as, for example, members of elected bodies, public decision makers, administrative and company officers, civil society and public opinion leaders (e.g., Brondi et al, 2014Brondi et al, , 2016Sarrica et al, 2016a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%