2018
DOI: 10.1111/ecca.12267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes Towards Large Income Risk in Welfare States: An International Comparison

Abstract: Using survey data and the instrument developed by Barsky et al. (1997), we estimate the distribution of attitudes towards income risk in a country where many employment and health-related risks are generously covered by a tax …nanced social insurance system (Norway 2006) . Under a CRRA assumption, the sample average for the coe¢ cient of relative risk aversion is 3.8 with a standard deviation of 2.3. This number is then contrasted to that for …ve other OECD countries where risk attitudes have been measured usi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(132 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With EZ, the CO 2 declines regardless of RA. We choose RA = 7 in our base-case calibration, a value roughly in line with attitudes toward large income risk across wealthy countries (59): RA in the United States alone is often higher (>8), while RA in European welfare states can be as low as 3. Similar patterns as those displayed in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With EZ, the CO 2 declines regardless of RA. We choose RA = 7 in our base-case calibration, a value roughly in line with attitudes toward large income risk across wealthy countries (59): RA in the United States alone is often higher (>8), while RA in European welfare states can be as low as 3. Similar patterns as those displayed in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calibrations differ widely in the literature. See, e.g., Schroyen and Aarbu (2017) for a review of RA calibrations, showing significantly lower values in "welfare states" like Norway but higher values (>9) for countries like the United States. OECD averages for RA toward large income risks are close to 7 (Schroyen and Aarbu, 2017).…”
Section: Figure Xix-a Higher (Lower) Eis Goes Hand-in-hand With a Higher (Lower) Optimal Co2 Price In Early Yearsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a comparison enables us to say something about the relative significance of risk-averse preferences for our sample relative to the national samples. The surveys were collected in 2002 for the USA ( n = 3,591) and Chile (n=11,475) and in 2006 for Norway ( n = 1,554) (for further details on the three surveys, see [ 37 ]). From Table 7 we observe that the distribution is skewed since 2 out of 3 households belong to category 4 (Strong).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%