2016
DOI: 10.1177/0264619615626057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes towards job protection legislation: Comparing insiders and outsiders in Finland, Norway and Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In some cases, LMIs themselves can act as quasi-unions. It would be also interesting to study the conditions under which the support provided by LMIs may lead to the development of labour market policies which address the demands of non-standard workers (Svalund et al, 2016). Further empirical is necessary in order to test the relevance of our grid in other institutional contexts and to inform the discussion around EU labour market reforms in a comparative perspective (Hall and Soskice, 2001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, LMIs themselves can act as quasi-unions. It would be also interesting to study the conditions under which the support provided by LMIs may lead to the development of labour market policies which address the demands of non-standard workers (Svalund et al, 2016). Further empirical is necessary in order to test the relevance of our grid in other institutional contexts and to inform the discussion around EU labour market reforms in a comparative perspective (Hall and Soskice, 2001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…an outsider position) is a general risk for all wage earners. Interestingly, recent research has found that workers in both insider and outsider positions favour firm employment protection regulation, at least in a Nordic context (Svalund et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…deregulation) than permanent workers. Svalund, Saloniemi and Vulkan (2016) analyse preferences for EPL in Nordic countries and observe that insiders are even more prone to demand deregulation than outsiders.…”
Section: The Available Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%