2017
DOI: 10.1177/0886260517690872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes Toward Violence and Gender as Predictors of Interpersonal Violence Interventions

Abstract: The purpose of the research was to determine whether attitudes toward violence (ATV) and participant sex would influence notions about interpersonal violence (IPV) intervention by university students. It was anticipated those who held stronger cultural and reactive violence attitudes and males would be less in favor of intervention, but it was not certain whether gender or attitudes would be the stronger predictor for intervention approaches. An IPV intervention scale was developed to measure preferred approac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(63 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, the comparison by gender in each of the IBIPV and IPDMV subscales showed a gender gap, as expected [ 19 , 23 27 , 29 , 31 , 43 ]. Thus, women expressed a stronger rejection towards IPVAW in all cases, which is consistent with previous research [ 16 , 43 , 47 , 50 , 60 , 61 , 63 , 64 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Secondly, the comparison by gender in each of the IBIPV and IPDMV subscales showed a gender gap, as expected [ 19 , 23 27 , 29 , 31 , 43 ]. Thus, women expressed a stronger rejection towards IPVAW in all cases, which is consistent with previous research [ 16 , 43 , 47 , 50 , 60 , 61 , 63 , 64 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Multiple comparisons between groups yielded two homogeneous sets for all dimensions: lower acceptance [Set 1] and higher acceptance [Set 2]. Adolescents (<18) and older adults (≥60) performed in higher acceptance, whereas middle-aged adults and young adults (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29) performed in lower acceptance, except in F3-VP, where young adults performed in the higher acceptance set with adolescents and older adults. 1 Set 1 = lower acceptance of IPVAW; Set 2 = higher acceptance of IPVAW.…”
Section: Explicit Measures Of Attitude Towards Ipvawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here again, two homogeneous sets are identified for the variables whose differences are statistically significant: lower acceptance [Set 1, i.e., higher perceived frequency] and higher acceptance [Set 2, i.e., lower perceived frequency]. Regarding perceived frequency of psychological abuse, attitudes differ between age groups by adopting a U-shape distribution: adolescents (<18) and older adults (≥60) performed in Set 2, whereas young adults (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29) and middle-aged adults (30-59) performed in Set 1. In the case of violent threats, only older adults performed in Set 2 whereas all the other groups performed in Set 1.…”
Section: Other Evidence About Attitudes Towards Ipvawmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the last decade, studies focused on the search for explanatory and predictive indicators of violence in teenager dating relationships have multiplied [ 19 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]. However, most have focused on the description and analysis of the role of aggressor, with the victims being once again the great forgotten [ 5 , 21 , 39 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%