1970
DOI: 10.1177/144078337000600204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes to Taking Human Life

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tamney, Johnson, and Burton (1992) similarly found that a measure of “all life,” which asked respondents whether capital punishment and euthanasia should be eliminated to preserve life, had no direct or indirect relationship with abortion attitudes. Several factor analyses have uniformly found two factors in respondents’ attitudes toward abortion, euthanasia, and capital punishment, with abortion and euthanasia loading on one factor and capital punishment on the other (Beswick, 1970; Cleghorn, 1986; Kalish, 1963 in MacNair). Interpretations of these results showing no attitudinal consistency across issues have varied considerably.…”
Section: Underlying Sources Of Capital Punishment Opinionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tamney, Johnson, and Burton (1992) similarly found that a measure of “all life,” which asked respondents whether capital punishment and euthanasia should be eliminated to preserve life, had no direct or indirect relationship with abortion attitudes. Several factor analyses have uniformly found two factors in respondents’ attitudes toward abortion, euthanasia, and capital punishment, with abortion and euthanasia loading on one factor and capital punishment on the other (Beswick, 1970; Cleghorn, 1986; Kalish, 1963 in MacNair). Interpretations of these results showing no attitudinal consistency across issues have varied considerably.…”
Section: Underlying Sources Of Capital Punishment Opinionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpretations of these results showing no attitudinal consistency across issues have varied considerably. These observed inconsistencies may be due to differences in the way people perceive personal morality versus social/political policies (Bogue, 2008; Cleghorn, 1986), death caused by oneself or death of another (Lester et al, 1990), or proactive versus reactive killing (Beswick, 1970).…”
Section: Underlying Sources Of Capital Punishment Opinionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, few studies have adequately examined attitudes toward suicide or euthanasia (Kalish et al, 1972). The studies conducted in this area have been based on samples from restricted populations (Kalish, 1963; Kalish et al, 1972; Beswick, 1970), or are largely impressionistic (Douglas, 1967a; Speijer, 1975).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, approximately one‐third of their student sample believed that “suicide is good.” Beswick's (1970) Australian data revealed that sex, religion and religiosity were related to acceptance of “mercy killing.” Females, Catholics, and highly religious individuals were all less likely to tolerate euthanasia. Beswick (1970) found no relationship between age or education and attitudes toward euthanasia. Speijer (1975), utilizing his own impressions stated that Dutch society is tolerant of suicide and euthanasia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While opinion polls continue to show substantial public disapproval (Gallup, 1978), survey studies were reporting significant support for the rights of suicide victims as early as 1970 (Beswick, 1970). In previous study (Domino et al, 1980), 12% of the respondents felt that society had no right to interfere with the wishes of suicide victims.…”
Section: Suicidal Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 98%