Attitudes to psychiatry and to mental illness among nursing students: Adaptation and use of two validated instruments in preclinical education

Abstract

Accessible SummaryWhat is known on the subject Stigma towards psychiatry and people with serious mental illness (SMI) is prevalent among healthcare providers and can adversely affect patient care. Internalized stigma among nurses can affect personal self‐care and limit help‐seeking behaviours. Stigma around mental health nursing can adversely affect recruitment into this already underserved field. What the paper adds to existing knowledge This is the first report on the adaptation and use in a nursing student sample of two widely used stigma‐related instruments that have been normed among medical students. The attitudes to psychiatry (ATP‐30) and the attitudes to mental illness (AMI) instruments proved sensitive to change and can be useful in tracking specific anti‐stigma curricular interventions. Interactive and participatory student activities in courses such as ours (that include simulation with standardized patients, clinical placements and patient interaction) need to be complemented by exposure to individuals with lived experience with mental illness in order to address stigmatized views of SMI. Nursing educators and fellow nurses willing to share their own experiences with mental illness—including diagnosis, health–seeking, treatment and recovery—may prove especially powerful and germane during nursing school. What are the implications for practice Even a strong academic curriculum is not sufficient to change stigmatized perceptions about mental illness, psychiatric care and mental health nursing as a profession. Comparison and potential synergy between ATP‐30, AMI and OMS‐HC (Opening Minds Scale for Health Care Providers) could prove fruitful in identifying a more comprehensive approach to stigma assessment over time. The addition of validated instruments, such as the Self‐Compassion Scale–Short Form (SCS–SF) and the Self‐Stigma of Seeking Help (SSOSH), which tap into internalized stigma and into health‐seeking behaviours and intervening barriers could prove particularly useful in evaluating innovative interventions for stigma‐decreasing initiatives in nursing education. Interactive and participatory didactic offerings need to be complemented by exposure to individuals with lived experience with mental illness and ideally to nursing educators and practicing nurses willing to share their histories of diagnosis, help‐seeking, treatment and recovery. AbstractIntroductionStigma towards psychiatry and to people with serious mental illness (SMI) is prevalent among healthcare providers and can adversely affect patient care. Such stigmatized views can adversely affect recruitment into the already underserved field of mental health nursing.Aim/questionWe adapted two stigma‐related instruments in a sample of nursing students and examined change in scores after participation in an eight‐week preclinical psychiatry curriculum. Our goal was to identify stigma‐malleable opportunities that would inform refinements in future iterations of a preclinical psychiatry curriculum in nursing.MethodWe made minor adaptations to the attitudes to psychiatry (ATP‐30) and the attitudes to mental illness (AMI) instruments. We invited first‐year nursing students to complete assessments at two time points: before and after completion of an eight‐week core course in preclinical psychiatry.ResultsSeventy‐one students completed the assessment at both time points. ATP‐30 and three of its eight subscale scores improved by course's endpoint. By contrast, AMI scores did not change. Compared with medical student published norms, nursing students in our sample had higher (less stigmatized) average scores.DiscussionThe ATP‐30 and the AMI can be easily adapted to a nursing student population and may prove useful in tracking specific anti‐stigma educational interventions.Implications for practiceA general psychiatry course during nursing school is, it and of itself, unlikely to change biased views about SMI and should be enhanced with exposure to, and interaction with individuals with lived experiences of mental illness, ideally by nurse educators and practicing nurses.

Addressing Electroconvulsive Therapy Knowledge Gaps and Stigmatized Views Among Nursing Students Through a Psychiatrist–APRN Didactic Partnership

“…Although we cannot identify which elements of the syllabus specifically contributed toward these changes, we can conclude that (a) this 8-week course improved stigmatized views around mental health in the four areas of attitudes, disclosure, social distance, and willingness to seek help; and (b) the instruments that we selected were psychometrically sensitive to detect such change. It is worth emphasizing both points, as they provide a hopeful counterpoint to earlier views (Sherwood, 2019;Thornicroft et al, 2016), including our own, that "even a strong academic curriculum is not sufficient to change stigmatized perceptions about mental illness, psychiatric care, and mental health nursing as a profession" (Martin et al, 2019). We incorporated visual media in the form of two short, widely available video clips: one representing what patients often say they envision when discussing ECT, and another that accurately portrays both the procedure and the experience from a modern patient perspective.…”

Time Waits for No One: Longitudinal Study on the Effects of an Anti-Stigma Seminar on the Psychology Student Population

“…In order to define the presence and to fight stigmatizing attitudes in health professionals, several studies were conducted with the involvement of undergraduate students in health degree courses: psychology students [16,26,27], nursing students [28][29][30], medical students [31], and general mental health professional students [20].…”

Effectiveness of a Video-Based Intervention on Reducing Perceptions of Fear, Loneliness, and Public Stigma Related to COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial

“…Dosage or intensity of the video-intervention might be a determining factor. Other studies showed the benefit of adding a booster (showing the video more than once) [ 30 ]. Failure to show significant reductions in fear and loneliness could be also attributed to inadequate content of the video-based interventions.…”