1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.1991.tb00339.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes to Effectiveness Auditing: Some Further Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(2 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These researchers point to the continuous change in the shape of the VfM audit and attribute this to the influence of audit bodies, the introduction of new VfM measures, and other social factors. Among the key recommendations put forward to improve the VfM audit practice is for the audit teams involved in the VfM audit process to include people not only from auditing backgrounds but also from other disciplines (Pendlebury & Shreim, 1990, 1991. However, this idea was not implemented in the UK VfM audit process in the last century.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These researchers point to the continuous change in the shape of the VfM audit and attribute this to the influence of audit bodies, the introduction of new VfM measures, and other social factors. Among the key recommendations put forward to improve the VfM audit practice is for the audit teams involved in the VfM audit process to include people not only from auditing backgrounds but also from other disciplines (Pendlebury & Shreim, 1990, 1991. However, this idea was not implemented in the UK VfM audit process in the last century.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value for money (VfM) audit in the United Kingdom has received the attention of many scholars who have explored the area from different perspectives (e.g., Alwardat et al, 2015;Lapsley & Pong, 2000;Pendlebury & Shreim, 1990, 1991Prowley et al, 2016;Sharma, 2007). These researchers point to the continuous change in the shape of the VfM audit and attribute this to the influence of audit bodies, the introduction of new VfM measures, and other social factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%