Attitudes of wildlife park visitors towards returning wildlife species: An analysis of patterns and correlates

Ostermann‐Miyashita, Emu‐Felicitas; Pernat, Nadja; König, Hannes; Hemminger, Karoline; Gandl, Nina; Bellingrath-Kimura, Sonoko Dorothea; Hibler, Sophia; Kiffner, Christian

doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109878

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 88 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A key advantage of citizen science is that it enables members of the public to be part of research (Bonney et al, 2009 ; Turrini et al, 2018 ), to gain knowledge and insights about the current situation of the target species (Jordan et al, 2011 ), which can contribute to higher acceptance and more positive attitudes towards the species (Ostermann‐Miyashita et al, 2023 ). Although the interviewed population in our pilot survey was not representative of the general public, the results showed a high (>90%) willingness to engage in moose monitoring efforts (Figure 5 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Opportunities and challenges for monitoring a recolonizing large herbivore using citizen science

Ostermann‐Miyashita,

Bluhm,

Dobiáš

et al. 2023

Ecology and Evolution

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Monitoring is a prerequisite for evidence‐based wildlife management and conservation planning, yet conventional monitoring approaches are often ineffective for species occurring at low densities. However, some species such as large mammals are often observed by lay people and this information can be leveraged through citizen science monitoring schemes. To ensure that such wildlife monitoring efforts provide robust inferences, assessing the quantity, quality, and potential biases of citizen science data is crucial. For Eurasian moose (Alces alces), a species currently recolonizing north‐eastern Germany and occurring in very low numbers, we applied three citizen science tools: a mail/email report system, a smartphone application, and a webpage. Among these monitoring tools, the mail/email report system yielded the greatest number of moose reports in absolute and in standardized (corrected for time effort) terms. The reported moose were predominantly identified as single, adult, male individuals, and reports occurred mostly during late summer. Overlaying citizen science data with independently generated habitat suitability and connectivity maps showed that members of the public detected moose in suitable habitats but not necessarily in movement corridors. Also, moose detections were often recorded near roads, suggestive of spatial bias in the sampling effort. Our results suggest that citizen science‐based data collection can be facilitated by brief, intuitive digital reporting systems. However, inference from the resulting data can be limited due to unquantified and possibly biased sampling effort. To overcome these challenges, we offer specific recommendations such as more structured monitoring efforts involving the public in areas likely to be roamed by moose for improving quantity, quality, and analysis of citizen science‐based data for making robust inferences.

show abstract