2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes of police officers towards syringe access, occupational needle-sticks, and drug use: A qualitative study of one city police department in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
113
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
9
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not atypical for police officers to exhibit substantial gaps in knowledge of the law related to public health interventions. 16 Similarly, research among drug users and other at-risk groups has identified pervasive lack of clarity about the law. [27][28][29][30] Our findings underscore the critical role of policy evaluation to evidence-based tailoring of public health laws in order to guarantee their positive impact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is not atypical for police officers to exhibit substantial gaps in knowledge of the law related to public health interventions. 16 Similarly, research among drug users and other at-risk groups has identified pervasive lack of clarity about the law. [27][28][29][30] Our findings underscore the critical role of policy evaluation to evidence-based tailoring of public health laws in order to guarantee their positive impact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,15 Previous research suggests that police are sometimes under-informed, and often ambivalent to public health laws, especially those based in a risk reduction framework. 16,17 In June 2010, Washington State became the second state to enact legislation to address these issues (Revised Code of Washington 69.50.315). 18 The law included both a Good Samaritan immunity provision for overdose victims and bystanders who seek medical aid, as well as allowed for naloxone to be prescribed to those at risk for having or witnessing an opioid overdose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…58,59 Implementation of these policy reforms may be limited by resource constraints, lack of political will, and governance failures. 4,6,26,28,31,62 Auxiliary mechanisms such as making federal grants contingent on specific implementation targets may improve policy implementation. 63 By adding a public health dimension to the societal costs of civil and human rights violations, our analysis magnifies the imperative to use a range of tools to curb extra-judicial police practices like syringe confiscation while also amplifying the broader calls to strengthen the rule of law in Mexico.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removal of injection equipment directly reduces drug user access to sterile syringes. Although police officers may perceive syringe confiscation as deterring drug use and furthering occupational safety, 31 evidence suggests that it instead triggers HIV risk behaviors: IDUs may react to confiscation by sharing syringes with others, rushing injection and injecting in public places most proximate to drug acquisition points, and using services of hit doctors or shooting galleries. 23,24,32,33 Syringe confiscation may also deter IDUs from carrying syringes to avoid detection, extortion, and abuse, meanwhile encouraging dangerous injection behaviors designed to conceal track marks, including groin injection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Police officers face elevated risk of acquiring blood-borne diseases such as HIV and hepatitis C from accidental needle stick injuries (NSIs) [1][2][3][4][5]-one of the highest puncture injury risks among all occupations [6]. This can detrimentally impact recruitment, retention, occupational stress, and police-community relations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%