1951
DOI: 10.2307/1976681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes of Foreign Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1955
1955
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences were in the predicted direction on all factors, but they were not significant in the case of Factors S and R. 11 The t scores and corresponding significance levels for directional hypotheses for factors M, E, S, R, and T, respectively, are 2.29 (p < .02), 2.26 (p < .02), .39 (.4 < p < .5), 1.48 (.05 < p < .1), and 3.14 (p < .005). According to these results, the highly world-minded person is less masculine and ascendant, more impul- 11 That this may have been due in the case of Factor S to its inappropriateness as a measure of the powervs.-love orientations of the High-.E and Low-E Ss in the Adorno volume is suggested by the significant difference between the world-minded and nationalistic 5s in what they mentioned on the posttest openended questions as the most enjoyable part of the summer. A significance test of the proportional difference in the frequency with which personal experiences in the case of the High-JT 5s compared to impersonal experiences in the case of the Low-W 5s were mentioned yielded a critical ratio of 2.79, (p < .01).…”
Section: The Extremely World-minded and The Extremely Nationalistic I...mentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The differences were in the predicted direction on all factors, but they were not significant in the case of Factors S and R. 11 The t scores and corresponding significance levels for directional hypotheses for factors M, E, S, R, and T, respectively, are 2.29 (p < .02), 2.26 (p < .02), .39 (.4 < p < .5), 1.48 (.05 < p < .1), and 3.14 (p < .005). According to these results, the highly world-minded person is less masculine and ascendant, more impul- 11 That this may have been due in the case of Factor S to its inappropriateness as a measure of the powervs.-love orientations of the High-.E and Low-E Ss in the Adorno volume is suggested by the significant difference between the world-minded and nationalistic 5s in what they mentioned on the posttest openended questions as the most enjoyable part of the summer. A significance test of the proportional difference in the frequency with which personal experiences in the case of the High-JT 5s compared to impersonal experiences in the case of the Low-W 5s were mentioned yielded a critical ratio of 2.79, (p < .01).…”
Section: The Extremely World-minded and The Extremely Nationalistic I...mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…
THOUGH research on the impact of intercultural experiences has increased considerably in recent years (4,10,11,13,15,23,25,26), many problems have not been explored. From the viewpoint of method, there is need for a study that employs control groups and more than one experimental group.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other barriers to effective counseling with the sojourner include ignorance of the client's culture (Pedersen, 1976;Vontress, 1969), the dangers of stereotyping the client as "cross-cultural" rather than viewing him or her as an individual 2 The number of studies of foreign student attitudes toward the United States is immense, this being one of the most heavily studied topics on educational exchange, especially during the 1950s and early 1960s. See, for example, Akhun, 1961;Beals and Humphrey, 1957;Becker, 1973;Coelho, 1958;Davis, 1961Davis, , 1963Gezi, 1961;Heath, 1970;Kiell, 1951;Lambert and Bressler, 1956;Loomis and Schuler, 1948;Melby and Wolf, 1961;Morris, 1960;Riegel, 1953;Scott, 1956;Selltiz et al, 1963;Sewell and Davidsen, 1961;Sharma, 1969;Shepard, 1970;U.S. Advisory Commission, 1963;Veroff, 1963; Barry, Note 6.…”
Section: Cross-cultural Counseling and Sojourner Adjustmentmentioning
confidence: 99%