Attitudes and Responses of Medical Students and Professional Anatomists to Dissecting Different Regions of the Body

Abstract

Although there have been many studies assessing emotional responses of medical students to the dissecting room experience, little is known about whether dissecting particular regions of the human body cause more concern than others. Furthermore, no studies have been conducted on the concerns of professional anatomists. In this study, we assessed the hypothesis that medical students are more concerned about the dissection of the face, the perineum and the extremities of the limbs. We also hypothesized that there are gender differences. For the reactions of a group of professional anatomists from the United States and Europe we hypothesized that they were less concerned than the medical students and showed no differences across the regions of the body. The hypotheses were tested by means of questionnaires distributed to medical students at Cardiff University and at the Descartes Paris University who had recently completed their anatomy courses and to anatomists working at universities in Europe and the USA. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the ethical committees at the Cardiff School of Biosciences and at Paris and all data was obtained by consent of the respondents and remained confidential. The findings were complex, although the level of concern was low overall. Some regional differences were discerned, particularly concerning the face, the perineum, the hand and the female chest. Anatomists were less concerned than the students and female students and female anatomists showed more concern than their male counterparts. Few differences were discerned however between student respondents who had positive and neutral attitudes to gender "politics" and those who espoused negative views. We recommend that, at the start of an anatomy dissection course, time is spent dealing with sensitive issues (including equality and diversity issues), emotional responses, and matters pertaining to mortality. However, we argue that this should not involve hiding regions of the body, nor overreacting to the natural anxiety of students, since doing either of these things could enhance negative reactions and stifle the progress of the student from *Correspondence to: B J Moxham,

YouTube‐based course orientation videos delivered prior to matriculation fail to alleviate medical student anxiety about anatomy

“…While video is capable of providing visual information, it is unethical, and in many cases illegal (Hennessy et al, 2020), to distribute certain images. For example, since students may find their first time seeing a body donor's face to be stressful (Leboulanger, 2011), unpleasant (Romo‐Barrientos et al, 2019), or concerning (Moxham et al, 2019), it may seem logical to provide this type of exposure via video prior to matriculation. However, personal identifiers of the body donors cannot be provided on a public platform.…”

The history of the term pudendum: Opening the discussion on anatomical sex inequality

“…The etymology of “pudendum,” for example, can be used to discuss the gender disparities outlined by Kent, Patel, and Varela (2012) that persist across healthcare delivery and access. These discussions can easily be added to the already established topics of ethics and mortality that commonly preface anatomy courses (Mohamd, Pleasant, Ligonier, & Morgan, 2019).…”

The practice of ethics in the context of human dissection: Setting standards for future physicians

“…It is a well-known fact that we tend to imbibe small nuances that we observe in our everyday life and gradually they become a part of how we present ourselves to the outside world. Accordingly students tend to embrace quite a few practices which they observe or do themselves (mostly guided to do under supervision) in the anatomy dissection room ( Bellier et al, 2019 ; Moxham et al, 2019 ). More so as they come across the dissection room experience very early in their career, hence it becomes imperative that the overall exercise of human dissection is followed within the boundaries of ethics thus setting an ideal example for the young minds to emulate in the future ( Jones, 1998 ; Cornwall and Hildebrandt, 2019 ).…”