2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitude stabilization of flexible spacecrafts via extended disturbance observer based controller

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is reasonable to suppose that the total disturbance and its higher order are bounded as given in Assumption 2. The boundedness condition is a common requirement in many existing spacecraft attitude control results [50][51][52].…”
Section: Relative Attitude Error Dynamics and Kinematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is reasonable to suppose that the total disturbance and its higher order are bounded as given in Assumption 2. The boundedness condition is a common requirement in many existing spacecraft attitude control results [50][51][52].…”
Section: Relative Attitude Error Dynamics and Kinematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Mofid and Mobayen (2018) proposes a technique of adaptive sliding mode control (ASMC) for finite-time stabilization of a UAV system with parametric uncertainties. Additionally, a higher-order EDO was applied for attitude stabilization of flexible spacecraft while investigating the effects of different orders on the performance of the EDO (Yan and Wu, 2017). It has been proved that the estimation accuracy can be improved with an increase in the observer order via choosing suitable observer gains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of late, nonlinear adaptive and robust control strategies have been proposed in the literature to solve the regulation problem in a flexible spacecraft. Some of the major attitude control paradigms are based on proportional derivative control (Liu et al, 2012), sliding mode control (Bang et al, 2005; Hu, 2012; Hu et al, 2008; Smaeilzadeh and Golestani, 2019; Tiwari et al, 2018), adaptive control (Chakravarty and Mahanta, 2016; Lu and Xia, 2013; Zhu et al, 2011), robust H control (Wu et al, 2018), switching control (Amrr et al, 2017), and disturbance observer based control (Li et al, 2016; Yan and Wu, 2017), and so forth. Although the aforementioned methodologies render satisfactory performance, they require continuous information of attitude trajectories in the calculation and update of the control law.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%