2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.07.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitude motion and sensor bias estimation onboard the SiriusSat-1 nanosatellite using magnetometer only

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This allowed reaching a high estimation accuracy, but it required a computational load and minimum sensor performances that are not suitable for nano-satellites. In these regards, the problem of attitude determination in nano-satellite was recently investigated by Fei [16], Li [17], and Ivanov [18]. These research works exploited miniaturized sensors; however, the obtained accuracy was in the range of 1 deg to 10 1 deg, and they did not provide MIL or HIL test results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allowed reaching a high estimation accuracy, but it required a computational load and minimum sensor performances that are not suitable for nano-satellites. In these regards, the problem of attitude determination in nano-satellite was recently investigated by Fei [16], Li [17], and Ivanov [18]. These research works exploited miniaturized sensors; however, the obtained accuracy was in the range of 1 deg to 10 1 deg, and they did not provide MIL or HIL test results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work in [60] builds on [46] and considers the case where the magnetometer bias is varying as the residual magnetic dipole varies. The estimation error of the magnetometer bias was within 8%.…”
Section: Magnetometer Bias and Magnetic Attitude Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%