2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2019.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitude estimation with intermittent measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with O defined in (22), which contradicts item (ii) of the Lemma that O has full rank of 15 + N , i.e., O z 2 > 0, ∀t ≥ 0.…”
Section: Proof Of Lemmamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…with O defined in (22), which contradicts item (ii) of the Lemma that O has full rank of 15 + N , i.e., O z 2 > 0, ∀t ≥ 0.…”
Section: Proof Of Lemmamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Note that the closed-loop system (15) evolves on the manifold SO(3) × R 6 , and one can easily verify that (I 3 , 0) is one of the equilibrium of system (15). Proposition 1: Let D u be a closed and bounded subset of R m .…”
Section: A Observer Design Using Continuous Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that the stability and performance would be altered if one tries to implement these continuous-time observers with intermittent measurements. In this context, some more recent results dealing with discrete measurements have been considered, for instance, the discrete-time attitude observers proposed in [12], [13] and the continuous-discrete attitude observers proposed in [14], [15]. The latter category assumes that the high-rate measurements of the angular velocity are continuous and the low-rate measurements of inertial vectors are intermittent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations