1976
DOI: 10.2514/3.27952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitude control of spinning spacecraft by radiation pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The closed-loop system including the satellite model equation (6) and the VS-MRAC control law equation (37) shown in the Fig. 2 is simulated for several choices of K, C s , eccentricity e, orbit inclination i, solar aspect angle φ, and disturbance inputs.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The closed-loop system including the satellite model equation (6) and the VS-MRAC control law equation (37) shown in the Fig. 2 is simulated for several choices of K, C s , eccentricity e, orbit inclination i, solar aspect angle φ, and disturbance inputs.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of an approximate, closed-form solution for libration motion and resonance of spinning satellites in the presence of solar radiation pressure has been considered [5]. In the literature, a variety of control systems have been also proposed for the attitude control of satellites using the SRP [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. The solar pressure control of spinning satellite has been treated [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…proposed for the single axis (pitch) attitude control of satellites using the SRP. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] A time-optimal SRP controller to control pitch angle has been obtained in Pande and Venkatachalam. 8 Based on a feedback linearization technique, a nonlinear SRP control law for the pitch attitude control has been presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These configurations have been suggested for sun-pointing satellites [7,8] and gravity-oriented satellites . Spinning [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] and Nomenclature a semi-major axis A surface area of solar flap exposed to impinging photons C 2 s pAr/(I x 2 ), a dimensionless solar parameter e orbital eccentricity h i control parameters, i = 1,2 i orbit inclination with respect to the equatorial planê i,ĵ,k unit vectors along the satellite body-fixed axes X, Y, Z, respectively I k principal centroidal moment of inertia of satellite about k-axis, k = x,y,z K (I y −I z )/I x ; satellite mass distribution parameter n j unit vector along normal to the surface of solar flap-j p nominal solar radiation pressure constant at 1 AU from the sun p i , q i control parameters, i = 1,2 r distance between the center of pressure of the solar flap from the system center of mass R orbital radius R E earth radius s j unit vector of the incoming light from the sun on the solar flap-j O-X o ,Y o ,Z o coordinate axes in the local vertical frame O-X,Y,Z satellite body coordinate frame s angle between the equatorial and ecliptic planes L satellite pitch angle with respect to orbital frame satellite pitch angle with respect to inertial framẽ satellite pitch angle tracking error with respect to inertial frame j in-plane angular rotation of the solar flap-j earth gravitational constant control parameter solar aspect angle or the angle between the direction of the sun and the nodal line d , s , t, a a fraction of impinging photons diffusely reflected, specularly reflected, transmitted, and absorbed, respectively angle with respect to the inertial axis Y I /a 3 , mean orbital rate ( · )j ( · ) for jth solar flap, j = 1,2 ( · ) o ( · ) at = 0 ( · ) , ( · ) d( · )/d and d 2 ( · )/d 2 , respectively |( · )| max absolute maximum amplitudes of ( · )…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%