2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attenuation of the prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response within and between sessions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A second limitation is that we did not assess severity of smoking behavior in the schizophrenia sample assessed in Bonn. However, in contrast to some previous studies (Duncan et al, 2001;Swerdlow et al, 2006), the method that we used in Bonn was less susceptible to the effects of smoking status on PPI, whereas it was proven sensitive to psychopathological modulations of PPI (Quednow et al, 2006a(Quednow et al, , b, c, 2008a. This might have two reasons: (1) smoking withdrawal can decrease PPI (George et al, 2006;Kumari and Gray, 1999), but our subjects were allowed to smoke ad libitum before testing; (2) heavy smokers with schizophrenia display higher PPI levels than light-or non-smoking patients (Swerdlow et al, 2006), which is in line with the finding that nicotine itself could enhance PPI (Kumari et al, 1997;Postma et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…A second limitation is that we did not assess severity of smoking behavior in the schizophrenia sample assessed in Bonn. However, in contrast to some previous studies (Duncan et al, 2001;Swerdlow et al, 2006), the method that we used in Bonn was less susceptible to the effects of smoking status on PPI, whereas it was proven sensitive to psychopathological modulations of PPI (Quednow et al, 2006a(Quednow et al, , b, c, 2008a. This might have two reasons: (1) smoking withdrawal can decrease PPI (George et al, 2006;Kumari and Gray, 1999), but our subjects were allowed to smoke ad libitum before testing; (2) heavy smokers with schizophrenia display higher PPI levels than light-or non-smoking patients (Swerdlow et al, 2006), which is in line with the finding that nicotine itself could enhance PPI (Kumari et al, 1997;Postma et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…For PPI, effects of genotype, trial, and drug treatment were analyzed. In addition, Pearson's product moment correlations were conducted to determine if there was an interrelation between startle magnitude and %PPI, as described previously (Quednow et al, 2006). In biochemical experiments, balanced groups of animals were raised at different times and killed on different days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entire test session lasted approximately 20 min. Trial exclusion and scoring criteria were identical to those used in previous studies (Quednow et al 2006a;Quednow et al 2006b). Subjects with response rejections >50% were excluded from data analysis.…”
Section: Startle Response Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean percent PPI of startle magnitude was calculated using the formula [% PPI = 100 × (magnitude on pulse alone (PA) trialsmagnitude on prepulse (PP) trials)/magnitude on PA trials] (Quednow et al 2006a;Quednow et al 2006b). For the assessment of startle habituation, PA trials were divided each into four blocks.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation