2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2003.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attenuation of porcine tissues in vivo after high-intensity ultrasound treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar changes were noted for degenerated bovine articular cartilage (Nieminen et al, 2004). The reported attenuation value increases over a hundred percent in case of porcine liver HIFU treatment in vivo (Zderic et al, 2004) or two hundred percent for porcine kidney thermal coagulation (Worthington, Sherar, 2001). It has been also reported that the attenuation coefficient differs for cancerous and healthy tissue (Saijo, Sasaki, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Similar changes were noted for degenerated bovine articular cartilage (Nieminen et al, 2004). The reported attenuation value increases over a hundred percent in case of porcine liver HIFU treatment in vivo (Zderic et al, 2004) or two hundred percent for porcine kidney thermal coagulation (Worthington, Sherar, 2001). It has been also reported that the attenuation coefficient differs for cancerous and healthy tissue (Saijo, Sasaki, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Hence, in translating the nonlinearity propagation seen in water to that seen in tissue for the same beam, for most tissue types it is the change in absorption which is the overwhelming consideration, not the change in B/A (Duck 2010). The absorption coefficients for soft tissue in the literature are for lower signal amplitudes than the ∼1 GPa levels found in this paper, and vary considerably (Burley et al 1980;Goss, Johnston & Dunn 1980;Damianou, Sanghvi & Fry 1997;Bailey et al 2003;Zderic et al 2004;Liu et al 2006;Coussios & Roy 2008). To reduce the range of values available even for the restricted amplitude range of clinical diagnostic device output, it is a standard practice to 'derate' the field values measured in water by 0.3 dB cm −1 MHz −1 , and for the data specific to the tissues and amplitudes occurring in this paper, this is also applied to the predicted values here to estimate the signals that would be detected were the fields to propagate through soft tissue.…”
Section: The Effect Of Tissuementioning
confidence: 57%
“…6,[14][15][16][17] The bovine fat results from Ref. 6 show a strong sensitivity to temperature, illustrating one of the difficulties in projecting in vitro results to in vivo situations.…”
Section: Attenuationmentioning
confidence: 99%