2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2016.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attenuation Correction of PET/MR Imaging

Abstract: SYNOPSIS PET/MR is a new promising multi-modality imaging approach. Attenuation is by far the largest correction required for quantitative PET imaging. MR based attenuation correction have been extensively pursued, especially for brain imaging in the past several years. In this article, we will focus on reviewing atlas and direct imaging MR based PET attenuation correction methods. The technical principles behind these methods are detailed and the advantages and disadvantages of these methods are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MRI-based attenuation correction is becoming similar to the CT-based method; however, cautions remain when comparing SUV values between a PET/CT and PET/MRI system for treatment monitoring. Particularly, MRI-based attenuation is still suboptimal for bone tissue and may cause an underestimation of SUV ( 49 ).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRI-based attenuation correction is becoming similar to the CT-based method; however, cautions remain when comparing SUV values between a PET/CT and PET/MRI system for treatment monitoring. Particularly, MRI-based attenuation is still suboptimal for bone tissue and may cause an underestimation of SUV ( 49 ).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To account for these challenges, a multitude of innovative methods for MRAC were developed over the course of years following the introduction of the first simultaneous PET/MR systems. These methods are well-summarized in the excellent review papers of Martinez-Möller and Nekolla [22], Hofmann et al [23], Berker and Li [24], Bezrukov et al [18], Chen and An [25], Izquierdo-Garcia and Catana [26], Keereman et al [17], Wagenknecht et al [27], and Mehranian et al [28] and partially in Teuho [29]. These methods have been proven to be fairly accurate, as a recent multicenter study with 11 [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the importance of an accurate μ‐map to enable accurate dose calculation in treatment planning, the development of novel approaches to generate pseudo CTs or synthetic CTs from MRI is an actively studied topic . State‐of‐the‐art approaches can be roughly classified into two main categories: image intensity‐based and atlas‐based .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%