2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10490-018-9621-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attenuating the negative effects of network change on innovation: A whole network level analysis of Taiwanese business groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, we use business group affiliation as the dichotomous variable to separate the firms. However, business groups are structurally not same (Chittoor & Aulakh, 2015) and not all affiliated firms receive similar treatment from the group headquarters (Li & Yayavaram, 2021;Mahmood et al, 2017). A more nuanced research design that incorporates some form of business group heterogeneity (Chari, 2013) into its hypothesized conceptual model is therefore warranted to understand entrepreneurial implication within differing business group structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, we use business group affiliation as the dichotomous variable to separate the firms. However, business groups are structurally not same (Chittoor & Aulakh, 2015) and not all affiliated firms receive similar treatment from the group headquarters (Li & Yayavaram, 2021;Mahmood et al, 2017). A more nuanced research design that incorporates some form of business group heterogeneity (Chari, 2013) into its hypothesized conceptual model is therefore warranted to understand entrepreneurial implication within differing business group structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing stream of research on the innovation in business group affiliated firms e.g. the substitutive and complementary role of institutions on the effect of business group affiliation on innovation (Wang, Yi, Kafouros, & Yan, 2015), effect of interfirm network governance on innovation management (Li & Yayavaram, 2021), and facilitating role of business group affiliation in producing more innovations (Choi et al, 2011). The key theoretical arguments in these studies are mostly anchored in the institutional voids view.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study makes the following theoretical contributions to the literature on business group affiliates in emerging markets (Bucheli et al , 2019; Li and Yayavaram, 2021; Purkayastha et al , 2021b). We offer an alternative explanation for the source of competitive advantage for business group-affiliated firms in emerging markets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this assumption (Alvesson and Sandberg, 2011), group specific capital and labor are readily available to affiliated firms, allowing them to compete with standalone firms and foreign subsidiaries (Mukherjee et al , 2018). Prior studies indicate that business group-affiliated firms use different forms of internal capabilities, such as international experience, reputation and understanding of domestic markets, as well as knowledge and connections with other affiliates, to activate their conventional resources (technology and brand) and facilitate their growth strategy (Chen and Jaw, 2014; Li and Yayavaram, 2021).…”
Section: Identify and Articulate Assumptions: Privileged Access To Th...mentioning
confidence: 99%