Attentional set shifting modulates the target P3b Response in the Wisconsin card sorting test

Barceló, Francisco; Múñoz-Céspedes, J M; Pozo, Miguel A.; Rubia, Francisco J.

doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00046-4

Cited by 125 publications

(103 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In turn, shift 2D cues evoked larger P3a potentials than stay 1 cues (P < 0.003; Figure 3). Stay 2 and later trials evoked similar brain responses in both type A and B series [3,4]. Finally, P3a amplitudes to shift 3D cues did not diminish over successive task blocks, consistent with behavioural evidence that set shifting costs do not decline with practice [20].…”

Section: Erps and Data Analysissupporting

confidence: 74%

“…The present ERP results support the latter alternative. Finally, the finding of feedback-locked frontally-distributed P3a activity helps to complete the picture offered by our previous ERP studies [3], suggesting that efficient WCST performance demands the activation of a widespread network of brain areas, with a key role played by prefrontal cortex. Further research will be necessary to map specific types of WCST deficits to specific anomalies in the frontal and posterior aspects of the P300 components reported here [2,13,17].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 56%

“…Initially, we found a gradual modulation of P3b amplitudes across "shift" and non-shift ("stay") trials time-locked to target card stimuli, but no clear evidence of a frontally distributed ERP activation [3]. Subsequent analyses revealed that the actual shift in set takes place at the feedback stage, that is, when a non-target "shift" feedback cue instructs the subject to adopt a new rule for the task at hand.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 69%

“…We used a computer version of the WCST designed to assess attention set shifting using ERP recordings [3]. The task protocol used the 24 choice-cards of the original 64 WCST cards that can be matched unambiguously with the four WCST key-cards based on just one stimulus dimension (i.e., either colour, shape, or number of items in the card; Fig.…”

Section: Behavioural Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Anschriften der Herausgeber

2007

Leitlinien Kinder- Und Jugendmedizin

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Erps and Data Analysissupporting

confidence: 74%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 56%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 69%

Section: Behavioural Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Anschriften der Herausgeber

2007

Leitlinien Kinder- Und Jugendmedizin

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In general, the P3 complex has been associated with the selection and categorization process of events (see, e.g., Barceló, Muñoz-Céspedes, Pozo, & Rubia, 2000;Barceló, Periáñez, & Knight, 2002;Kok, 2001)-that is, the decision as to whether an event matches or does not match its internal representation. So, for example, the P3 amplitude was modulated by the number of task rules or sensory items held in memory (Barceló et al, 2002;Bledowski et al, 2006).…”

Section: Target-related Activitymentioning

confidence: 99%

At your own peril: An ERP study of voluntary task set selection processes in the medial frontal cortex

Forstmann

Ridderinkhof

Kaiser

et al. 2007

Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Connecting EEG signal decomposition and response selection processes using the theory of event coding framework

Takács

Zink

Wolff

et al. 2020

Human Brain Mapping

142

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the integration of perception and action are an important topic in cognitive neuroscience. Yet, connections between neurophysiology and cognitive theoretical frameworks have rarely been established. The theory of event coding (TEC) details how perceptions and actions are associated (bound) in a common representational domain (the “event file”), but the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying these processes are hardly understood. We used complementary neurophysiological methods to examine the neurophysiology of event file processing (i.e., event‐related potentials [ERPs], temporal EEG signal decomposition, EEG source localization, time‐frequency decomposition, EEG network analysis). We show that the P3 ERP component and activity modulations in inferior parietal regions (BA40) reflect event file binding processes. The relevance of this parietal region is corroborated by source localization of temporally decomposed EEG data. We also show that temporal EEG signal decomposition reveals a pattern of results suggesting that event file processes can be dissociated from pure stimulus and response‐related processes in the EEG signal. Importantly, it is also documented that event file binding processes are reflected by modulations in the network architecture of theta frequency band activity. That is, when stimulus–response bindings in event files hamper response selection this was associated with a less efficient theta network organization. A more efficient organization was evident when stimulus–response binding in event files facilitated response selection. Small‐world network measures seem to reflect event file processing. The results show how cognitive‐theoretical assumptions of TEC can directly be mapped to the neurophysiology of response selection.

show abstract

Attentional set shifting modulates the target P3b Response in the Wisconsin card sorting test

Cited by 125 publications

References 46 publications

Anschriften der Herausgeber

Anschriften der Herausgeber

At your own peril: An ERP study of voluntary task set selection processes in the medial frontal cortex

Connecting EEG signal decomposition and response selection processes using the theory of event coding framework

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About