2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attentional control theory: Anxiety, emotion, and motor planning

Abstract: The present study investigated how trait anxiety alters the balance between attentional control systems to impact performance of a discrete preplanned goal-directed motor task. Participants executed targeted force contractions (engaging the goal-directed attentional system) at the offset of emotional and non-emotional distractors (engaging the stimulus-driven attentional system). High and low anxious participants completed the protocol at two target force levels (10% and 35% of maximum voluntary contraction). … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
76
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
3
76
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, research on the impact of emotions on motor performance supports potential benefits of anxiety-based interventions. For example, Coombes, Higgins, Gamble, Cauraugh, and Janelle (2009) found that motor efficiency is compromised in high, relative to low, anxious individuals under elicited anxiety, but suppression of emotional expression buffers the negative effect of pressure (Beatty, Fawver, Hancock, & Janelle, 2014). Thus, anxiety-based choking interventions should be proposed and explored to contest dysfunctional anxiety-based fears that may ruminate in athletes, but could also be partially supplemented by some of the other attention-based models explained in this systematic review.…”
Section: Choking Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Similarly, research on the impact of emotions on motor performance supports potential benefits of anxiety-based interventions. For example, Coombes, Higgins, Gamble, Cauraugh, and Janelle (2009) found that motor efficiency is compromised in high, relative to low, anxious individuals under elicited anxiety, but suppression of emotional expression buffers the negative effect of pressure (Beatty, Fawver, Hancock, & Janelle, 2014). Thus, anxiety-based choking interventions should be proposed and explored to contest dysfunctional anxiety-based fears that may ruminate in athletes, but could also be partially supplemented by some of the other attention-based models explained in this systematic review.…”
Section: Choking Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In view of the research evidence highlighted above, one might argue that as anxiety is a potentially treatable condition [69,[136][137][138][139], intervention may prove am important factor in the management of individuals living with cognitive impairment and dementia [2,62,75], with dissemination of information regarding late-life anxiety disorder vital as evidence-based treatments, pharmacological and psychotherapy, are available [43, [131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140][141]. There are however important caveats to consider.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As pupillary function and the pupillary light reflex have been found to be significantly abnormal in AD [129] concomitant anxiety in AD may further exacerbate the effects of the disease and confound research results. Anxiety has also been reported to slow processing speeds in older adults with severe state anxiety [101,130,131].…”
Section: Anxiety and Attention-related Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence suggests that changes in autonomic nervous system activity associated with emotion have direct effects on motor circuitries that modulate speed [20] and force of movement [12, 21, 22]. For instance, emotionally arousing (e.g., anxiety-provoking) stimuli have been shown to elicit increases in reaction times [11], increases in force production [23, 24], and increases in speed of movement [25] when performing simple tasks such as wrist and finger extension tasks [23], pinch grip tasks [26], and finger tapping tasks [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%