2010
DOI: 10.1167/2.7.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attentional changes with age: Evidence from attentional blink deficits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There appears to be a refractory period in which attention is not available for processing the second target if it appears between 200 and 500 ms after the first. Targets presented later in the RSVP stream are normally easily identified though this is not the case in aging populations in which the blink recovers more slowly (Georgiou-Karistianis et al, 2007;Maciokas & Crognale, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There appears to be a refractory period in which attention is not available for processing the second target if it appears between 200 and 500 ms after the first. Targets presented later in the RSVP stream are normally easily identified though this is not the case in aging populations in which the blink recovers more slowly (Georgiou-Karistianis et al, 2007;Maciokas & Crognale, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, it has been shown that age negatively correlates with performance on the AB task and that the magnitude of the AB increases with age (GeorgiouKaristianis et al, 2007;Maciokas & Crognale, 2003). This increase in blink is twofold: Firstly, older participants miss the second target more frequently and secondly, they miss it for longer periods of time following T1 detection (Georgiou-Karistianis et al, 2007;Maciokas & Crognale, 2003). Presumably, aging participants have a longer blink due to a reduced ability to sustain attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Far fewer investigations have been aimed at correlative analyses of the relationship between the AB and factors that pertain to the observers themselves rather than -or as well as -the stimuli and the tasks. To be sure, there have been studies relating the AB to ADHD (Mason, Humphreys, & Kent, 2005), dyslexia (Lum, Conti-Ramsden, & Lindell, 2007), aging (Maciokas & Crognale, 2003), and brain injury (Husain, Shapiro, Martin, & Kennard, 1997), but these studies have been decidedly in the minority, as well as being confined mainly to special populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon was termed the attentional blink (Raymond, Shapiro, & Arnell, 1992) and correspondingly, RSVP paradigms with two task relevant stimuli are widely referred to as attentional blink paradigms. Differences in the attentional blink (AB) between older and younger participants have been addressed in a number of studies (Georgiou-Karistianis et al, 2007;Lahar, Isaak, & McArthur, 2001; Lee & Hsieh, 2009;Maciokas & Crognale, 2003). The general finding is that older adults experience a deeper and longer AB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general finding is that older adults experience a deeper and longer AB. This has been interpreted as reflecting reduced inhibition with regard to the non-target stimuli in the RSVP stream (GeorgiouKaristianis et al, 2007;Lahar et al, 2001;Maciokas & Crognale, 2003) or, alternatively or in addition, a longer attentional dwell time for T1 in older participants (Georgiou-Karistianis et al, 2007). Attentional dwell time is the time it takes to form a representation of the target in a working memory store (Isaak, Shapiro, & Martin, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%