2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attentional Bias to Reminders of the Deceased as Compared With a Living Attachment in Grieving

Abstract: We have demonstrated an attentional bias to reminders of the deceased versus a living attachment in grieving. Overlapping neural circuits related to living- and deceased-related attention suggest that the bereaved employ similar processes in attending to the deceased as they do in attending to the living. Deceased-related attentional bias appears to be linked primarily to intrusive thinking about the loss.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be interpreted as a relative inability of individuals with complicated grief to recruit the regions needed to down-regulate emotional responses in order to successfully complete the task. In the third study using the emotional Stroop and bereaved participants across the spectrum of grief severity(71), bereaved individuals did not show differential brain activation to words related to the deceased versus living attachment figures, even at a lenient statistical threshold. Notably, this was despite their finding of a behavioral attentional bias towards the deceased, with greater attentional bias associated with higher levels of complicated grief symptoms.…”
Section: Adaptation Of the Brain During Griefmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This could be interpreted as a relative inability of individuals with complicated grief to recruit the regions needed to down-regulate emotional responses in order to successfully complete the task. In the third study using the emotional Stroop and bereaved participants across the spectrum of grief severity(71), bereaved individuals did not show differential brain activation to words related to the deceased versus living attachment figures, even at a lenient statistical threshold. Notably, this was despite their finding of a behavioral attentional bias towards the deceased, with greater attentional bias associated with higher levels of complicated grief symptoms.…”
Section: Adaptation Of the Brain During Griefmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…MRI acquisition and pre-processing are the same as described in prior work and explained in supplemental information (Schneck et al , 2017; Schneck et al , 2018a; Schneck et al , 2018b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure that neural activity reflected attentional processing rather than neural reaction to the substantial semantic differences between deceased-related and color-congruent words, a trial level on/off regressor was included. We have previously shown that the process of d-SA likely comprises a subset within a broader process of attachment-related attention (Schneck et al , 2018b). As a result, the contrast of deceased-related vs congruent, rather than deceased-related vs living words, was used.…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations