2022
DOI: 10.1007/s42761-022-00146-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attention Towards Pupil Size in Humans and Bonobos (Pan paniscus)

Abstract: Previous work has established that humans have an attentional bias towards emotional signals, and there is some evidence that this phenomenon is shared with bonobos, our closest relatives. Although many emotional signals are explicit and overt, implicit cues such as pupil size also contain emotional information for observers. Pupil size can impact social judgment and foster trust and social support, and is automatically mimicked, suggesting a communicative role. While an attentional bias towards more obvious e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 76 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, greater relative sclera exposure at the correctly cued location facilitated RTs suggesting that sclera exposure is a salient feature of faces that impacts observers' attention. This finding is similar to a recent report indicating that larger pupil sizes facilitate attentional bias to the eye region of faces [29]. Thus, it appears that both pupil size and sclera exposure modulate attention, which may not be surprising given the strong correlation between these measures observed in the present report.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Specifically, greater relative sclera exposure at the correctly cued location facilitated RTs suggesting that sclera exposure is a salient feature of faces that impacts observers' attention. This finding is similar to a recent report indicating that larger pupil sizes facilitate attentional bias to the eye region of faces [29]. Thus, it appears that both pupil size and sclera exposure modulate attention, which may not be surprising given the strong correlation between these measures observed in the present report.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%