Attention to vulnerable people in the First Constitutional and Social Transitory Chamber of the Supreme Court of the Republic in Lima

Abstract

Object of study: The objective of the research was to explain how vulnerable people are treated in the First Constitutional and Social Transitory Court of the Supreme Court of the Republic, in Lima; that is, how is the preferential treatment of people in vulnerable situations: people over 75 years of age, the disabled and others. Methodology: A descriptive qualitative methodology was used, which allowed us to understand the way in which the fourteen participants in this research appreciated the phenomena or events through the understanding of the main aspects of the phenomena, of the facts under observation or of the relationships established by the subjects. This research will provide a service to jurisdictional operators and citizens seeking fast and efficient jurisdictional protection; optimizing and improving the attention of the community in the judicial processes that reach this institution, based on conceptual formulations and implementation measures related to this problem. Main results: The results show us that the attention to vulnerable persons in the First Supreme Court is inadequate due to the existing procedural overload; that is, it is not prompt, which affects compliance with the deadlines established in the legal regulations in force, of the controversies of the administrative process and will contribute to the modernization of the mentioned judicial body in order to provide a better service to its users. Theoretical contributions: Rights must be complemented by political and social rights that allow the needs of the most vulnerable to be met, alleviating their suffering and providing them with opportunities for progress. To safeguard the vulnerable, bioethics must be considered in public policies by standardizing their care practices.

Features of the Prevention of Entrepreneurial Offenses in the Formation of a Legal State

“…In this regard, the most important problem of combating crimes is their prevention, elimination of causes and conditions, inhibition of ways that cause or influence dangerous actions to society. It is necessary to deal with various types of crime at the level of their early prevention: prevention of crimes and consistent implementation of legal responsibility for crimes committed in the past (Huabil et al, 2022) Of course, issues of crime prevention should be in the attention of society and the state. Organization of early warning of violations in the business sphere, allocation of the leading role in prevention of all violations is the main key to beautify the economy of each state.…”

Existence of Immediate Decisions (Uitvoerbaar Bij Voorraad) and its Execution in the Civil Justice System in Indonesia

“…The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia has deter.mined that a judge's decision must consider all aspects that are juridical, philosophical, and sociological in nature, so that the justice to be achieved, realized, and accounted for in a judge's decision is justice. (Huabil et al, 2022)besides that justice must be based on values in society such as, legal justice, moral justice, and social justice (Rifa'i, 2010). In 2019 to build and develop the execution of court decisions for more than 2 weeks, ten delegates from Indonesia conducted…”

The Transformation of the Role of the Constitutional Court of Indonesia: From Negative Legislature to Positive Legislature in the Context of Judicial Review Authority (A Study of Decision Number 90/Puu-Xxi/2023)

“…Even the majority judge stated that this is a different issue. In theory, court decisions, including those of the Constitutional Court, can change, but such changes occur when there are substantially different conditions (Huabil et al, 2022). Changes in Constitutional Court decisions happen when there is stronger argumentation to overturn previous arguments, influenced by the gradual evolution of society (Abustan, 2023).…”