2013
DOI: 10.1001/2013.jamapsychiatry.188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attention to Threats and Combat-Related Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(54 reference statements)
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Sipos et al, 2013;Wald, Shechner, et al, 2011;Wald et al, 2013). Associations of these samples may reflect our association found when attentional control was high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…(Sipos et al, 2013;Wald, Shechner, et al, 2011;Wald et al, 2013). Associations of these samples may reflect our association found when attentional control was high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…First, some previous research supporting attentional control theory has demonstrated lowered anxiety as a result of either training towards or training away from threat (Klumpp & Amir, 2010), although research in this area has been mixed (e.g., Heeren et al, 2012). Given that some research suggests that individuals who develop PTSD may possess both an attentional bias away from threat (Beevers, Lee, Wells, Ellis, & Telch, 2011; Sipos, Bar-Haim, Abend, Adler, & Bliese, 2014; Wald et al, 2013) as well as deficits in attentional control (Aupperle et al, 2012), it may be the case that that training direction (i.e., towards or away from threat) is of less importance than the fact that the training contains a contingency between emotional stimuli and required response in which the individual learns to exert top-down attentional control over presented stimuli. Second, it may be the case that individuals who initially present with a bias away from threat possess a cognitive strength that is more easily maximized through attention training away from threat, relative to individuals who have a pre-existing difficulty attending away from threat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, prior studies have often focused on populations with exposure to discrete traumatic events (e.g., hurricane exposure) (Kilpatrick et al, 2007) rather than exposure to ongoing threat or stress. However, at least one study with Israeli soldiers suggests that among soldiers who developed vigilance to combat threat cues, those with S alleles were less likely to develop PTSD relative to those with L alleles (Wald et al, 2013). Thus, in environments characterized by more chronic stress or threat, the S alleles may have a protective effect relative to the L alleles, perhaps by increasing the ability to attend and respond to risk cues adaptively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%