2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attention to irrelevant contexts decreases as training increases: Evidence from eye-fixations in a human predictive learning task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
17
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, with a few cue-outcome pairings a detrimental effect of context change has been observed that disappeared with more extended training (e.g., León, et al, 2011). Eye tracking confirmed that overt visual attention to the contextual cues was also higher earlier in training than later (Aristizabal, Ramos-Álvarez, Callejas-Aguilera, & Rosas, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…For instance, with a few cue-outcome pairings a detrimental effect of context change has been observed that disappeared with more extended training (e.g., León, et al, 2011). Eye tracking confirmed that overt visual attention to the contextual cues was also higher earlier in training than later (Aristizabal, Ramos-Álvarez, Callejas-Aguilera, & Rosas, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Recent reports suggest that the differential susceptibility of information to the effects of context switches at different moments of training may be due to changes on the attention contexts received as training progresses. Aristizabal, Ramos-Álvarez, Callejas-Aguilera, & Rosas, (2016) found that gaze dwell time to redundant contexts decreased as training progressed in human predictive learning, and that the time human participants spent looking at familiar contexts increased when unexpected information was presented within them (Aristizabal, RamosÁlvarez, Callejas-Aguilera, & Rosas, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in the causal learning literature, it has been reported that the order in which positive and negative instances of a causeeffect relationship are presented during the training session can have a profound impact, so that participants will come to make the judgment that there is a stronger causal relationship when the positive instances are presented last than when they are presented first or in a randomized order [27], [28]. In addition, it has been shown that there is also a cumulative effect of previous training, as can be seen, for example, in the decreasing attention that participants pay to the context when it provides none of the information needed to solve a task [29], [30]. Classical experiments on proactive and retroactive interference are also excellent examples of the potential influence of trial order effects [31], [32].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%