2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.16.528799
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attention network for predicting T cell receptor-peptide binding can associate attention with interpretable protein structural properties

Abstract: Motivation: Understanding how a T cell receptor (TCR) recognizes its specific ligand peptide is crucial for gaining insight into biological functions and disease mechanisms. Despite its importance, experimentally determining TCR-peptide interactions can be expensive and time-consuming. To address this challenge, several computational methods have been proposed, but none have incorporated an attention layer from language models in conjunction with TCR-peptide "structural" binding mechanisms. Results: In this st… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CDR3 region interacts with the amino acid residues on the peptide through various non-covalent interactions, such as hydrogen bonding, ionic interactions, and van der Waals forces, to establish stable binding. The three-dimensional (3D) structure, determined by these amino acid sequences, underlies the speci c binding of CDR3 to different epitopes 12,13 . Thus, individual sequence data alone are insu cient to capture all the information that governs CDR-epitope binding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CDR3 region interacts with the amino acid residues on the peptide through various non-covalent interactions, such as hydrogen bonding, ionic interactions, and van der Waals forces, to establish stable binding. The three-dimensional (3D) structure, determined by these amino acid sequences, underlies the speci c binding of CDR3 to different epitopes 12,13 . Thus, individual sequence data alone are insu cient to capture all the information that governs CDR-epitope binding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More complex models [5,6,7,8] are also proposed for the classification task. Many deep learning models (NetTCR [9], DeepTCR [7], ImRex [8], tcrpred [10]) rely on convolutional neural networks to learn the TCR and peptide patterns in each interaction. TITAN [11], ATM-TCR [12], and tcrpred [10] further evaluate the pairwise interactions by crossing the TCR and peptide patterns in an attention structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many deep learning models (NetTCR [9], DeepTCR [7], ImRex [8], tcrpred [10]) rely on convolutional neural networks to learn the TCR and peptide patterns in each interaction. TITAN [11], ATM-TCR [12], and tcrpred [10] further evaluate the pairwise interactions by crossing the TCR and peptide patterns in an attention structure. Some other tools, particularly ERGO-I [13] and pMTnet [14], use long short-term memory (LSTM) to learn the sequential information of TCR and peptides, and autoencoder layers to simultaneously improve the data understanding and reduce the feature space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CDR3 region interacts with the amino acid residues on the peptide through various non-covalent interactions, such as hydrogen bonding, ionic interactions and van der Waals forces, to establish stable binding. The three-dimensional (3D) structure, determined by these amino acid sequences, underlies the specific binding of CDR3 to different epitopes [ 14 , 15 ]. Thus, individual sequence data alone cannot capture all the information governing CDR–epitope binding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%