2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2021.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attention monitoring for synchronous distance learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that internet access and the ability of teachers to manage the learning process greatly affected students' distance learning outcomes. This is supported by Abate et al (2021) in their study which suggests that the problem that often occurs in the distance learning period is the difficulty of having good internet access which causes students to easily get bored and tired. Moreover, the lack of teacher expertise in using the software as a means of online learning media also affected students' learning motivation, such as being easily bored with the content presented by the teacher which barely stimulated the attention of students.…”
Section: Response To Government Policy Regarding Distance Learningmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This indicates that internet access and the ability of teachers to manage the learning process greatly affected students' distance learning outcomes. This is supported by Abate et al (2021) in their study which suggests that the problem that often occurs in the distance learning period is the difficulty of having good internet access which causes students to easily get bored and tired. Moreover, the lack of teacher expertise in using the software as a means of online learning media also affected students' learning motivation, such as being easily bored with the content presented by the teacher which barely stimulated the attention of students.…”
Section: Response To Government Policy Regarding Distance Learningmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The decrease in performance of the control group may be due to the negative effects of emergency distance education on the quality of learning (Abate et al, 2021;Bower et al, 2015) showed that technology may become a barrier for teachers and students if distance learning is not used properly, and Shi et al (2021) mentioned that synchronous communication may not be stable, and sometimes could be easily interrupted or stuck, which brings learners a bad learning experience, leading to some content not being accepted in time and so affecting learning efficiency. There was no significant difference in the scores of the experimental group, probably due to the interaction between the advantages of gamified learning and the negative effects of emergency remote learning did not lead to a decrease in students' learning effectiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bao (2020) pointed out that in face-to-face course teaching, teachers often use body language, facial expressions, and speech sounds to deliver lessons, but "body language" cannot be delivered through online courses. Remote education suffers from a lack of feedback from the expressions and behaviors of the students attending the class (Abate et al, 2021), and teachers of remote courses are unable to control what students must learn and therefore rely on student autonomy. Therefore, the implementation of online remote education and its learning effectiveness depend heavily on the high level of active learning and self-organization of students outside the classroom (Bao, 2020;Barlovits et al, 2021).…”
Section: Limitations Of Emergency Remote Mathematics Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In traditional classrooms, experienced teachers can easily judge the level of engagement through observation and intervene where necessary. Moreover, it also provides continuous visual feedback to teachers and assists them to understand if the student is following the content properly or not [2]. However, this flexibility has been lost in remote teaching and learning environments where no visual feedback is available, making it difficult to monitor the student attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%