2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.09.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attention improves information flow between neuronal populations without changing the communication subspace

Abstract: Highlights d Attention improves linear response prediction between MT and SC d Prediction accuracy within areas is not affected d The dimensionality of the communication subspace between MT and SC remains the same d Improvements in prediction accuracy are not contingent on dimensionality changes

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with recent work suggesting that trial-by-trial covariability is primarily orthogonal to sensory coding dimensions and reflects non-sensory motor or cognitive variables, such as whisking, running, or arousal (Musall et al, 2019;Stringer et al, 2019b). Our results contribute to a growing body of evidence that covariability does not usually reflect information limiting noise, but instead reflects important cognitive processes active in different brain regions during sensory decision making (Srinath et al, 2021).…”
Section: Implications For the Role Of Correlated Actisuvity In Sensor...supporting
confidence: 91%
“…These findings are consistent with recent work suggesting that trial-by-trial covariability is primarily orthogonal to sensory coding dimensions and reflects non-sensory motor or cognitive variables, such as whisking, running, or arousal (Musall et al, 2019;Stringer et al, 2019b). Our results contribute to a growing body of evidence that covariability does not usually reflect information limiting noise, but instead reflects important cognitive processes active in different brain regions during sensory decision making (Srinath et al, 2021).…”
Section: Implications For the Role Of Correlated Actisuvity In Sensor...supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The details of this analysis can be found in (46,86,87). We followed the same steps as previously published work (41,43) to estimate the dimensionality: We first determined the number of dimensions 𝑚 "-%. that maximized the cross-validated log-likelihood of the observed residuals.…”
Section: Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models omit the computational stages by which brains integrate the response to the cue with the responses to the target, nor do they predict the distribution of cell response properties that one might expect in the brain of biological organisms that manifest behavioral cue effects and covert attention. Even with the progress in multi-neuronal and multi-size recordings, physiological studies probe a small subset of neurons and areas, typically less than 1000 neurons [21][22][23] . How to map these measurements into computational stages is not straightforward [24][25][26] .…”
Section: When Appearing At the Uncued Location (Invalid Cue Trials)mentioning
confidence: 99%