2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attention capacities of preterm and term born toddlers: A multi-method approach

Abstract: Preterm children showed an increased risk for suboptimal functioning in alerting attention capacities, as early as at a toddler age.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Telford et al [ 16 ] demonstrated that VLBW preterm infants have shorter attention spans in response to social stimuli of increasing complexity than healthy term controls at a median age of 7 months, pointing to atypical attentional control. De Jong et al [ 1 ] studied the development of the attention capacity of 123 VLBW preterm infants at 18 months using eye-tracking, and compared it to that of 101 term children. The VLBW preterm infants had lower orienting and alerting attention abilities at 18 months, suggesting that they are at increased risk of attention problems at school age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Telford et al [ 16 ] demonstrated that VLBW preterm infants have shorter attention spans in response to social stimuli of increasing complexity than healthy term controls at a median age of 7 months, pointing to atypical attentional control. De Jong et al [ 1 ] studied the development of the attention capacity of 123 VLBW preterm infants at 18 months using eye-tracking, and compared it to that of 101 term children. The VLBW preterm infants had lower orienting and alerting attention abilities at 18 months, suggesting that they are at increased risk of attention problems at school age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We designed the experimental tasks to induce attention and object permanence based on previous reports, using a modification of the methods of de Jong et al and Lowe et al [ 1 , 9 ]. The tasks consisted of watching 3 video clips in which an actress presented different stimuli involving 2 cups and a yogurt bottle.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to the reproducibility of individual differences, we examined whether these differences were associated with risk factors that are common in low‐resource settings, particularly preterm birth, but also malnutrition, and psychosocial risk factors. The possibility that infants early attentional behaviors are sensitive to these risk factors is suggested by previous studies in high‐resource settings showing slower visual orientation (Landry, Leslie, Fletcher, & Francis, ; Pel et al., ; Shah et al., ; however, see also Foreman, Fielder, Price, & Bowler, ; Hunnius, Geuze, Zweens, & Bos, ; Rose, Feldman, Jankowski, & Caro, for contrary evidence), slower attention shifts between two competing objects (Atkinson et al., ; Butcher, Kalverboer, Geuze, & Stremmelaar, ; de Jong, Verhoeven, & van Baar, ), and reduced attention to faces (Telford et al., ) in preterm infants. Further, various sources of evidence from high‐ and low‐resource settings point to poorer cognitive function in growth‐stunted children (Champakam, Srikantia, & Gopalan, ; Galler et al., ; Rose, ; Thompson et al., ) and in children raised in low socioeconomic status households (Hackman, Gallop, Evans, & Farah, ).…”
Section: Early Development Of Visual Attention In Infants In Rural Mamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a pilot study was shown that the UTATE was feasible for use with 18-month-old children: the toddlers cooperated well during the procedure, and the data was of good quality and measured individual variation (De Jong et al, 2016b). Furthermore, sufficient split half reliability was found (De Jong et al, 2015, 2016b. In a second study, factorial validity of the UTATE was shown by a confirmatory factor analyses providing evidence for three underlying factors (i.e., orienting, alerting, and executive attention), as was expected based on the theory underlying the design of the tasks (De Jong et al, 2016a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%