2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2023.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attention-based multimodal glioma segmentation with multi-attention layers for small-intensity dissimilarity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existing AMMGS 58 method had lower performance compared to other methods. Previous ResUNet+ 59 method and RBAF method had varying performances, with the latter showing relatively lower DSC values and higher Hausdorff 95 distances.…”
Section: Experimental Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The existing AMMGS 58 method had lower performance compared to other methods. Previous ResUNet+ 59 method and RBAF method had varying performances, with the latter showing relatively lower DSC values and higher Hausdorff 95 distances.…”
Section: Experimental Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The existing AMMGS 58 observed that the introduced method achieves higher performance than the conventional approaches.…”
Section: Achieved Performance Measures For Brats2020mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main aim is to estimate mean values for such skewed histograms. The minimum case of the Gumbel distribution, which is derived from (6), is shown in (7) and (8); this is to estimate the mean values for the object and background samples in a given image.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in some medical images, the skewness of a histogram can be influenced by factors such as the image acquisition parameters. When Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) a brain, the segmentation task is affected if the intensity dissimilarity between adjacent glioma regions is small; this challenge was solved using U-Net to propose attention layers for small-intensity dissimilarities [7]. Moreover, Computed Tomography (CT) scan images can indeed vary depending on multiple factors, including the stage and type of infection, while the proportion of infected pixels in CT images is small [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%