Attention and Visual Search

Abstract

Selective Tuning (ST) presents a framework for modeling attention and in this work we show how it performs in covert visual search tasks by comparing its performance to human performance. Two implementations of ST have been developed. The Object Recognition Model recognizes and attends to simple objects formed by the conjunction of various features and the Motion Model recognizes and attends to motion patterns. The validity of the Object Recognition Model was first tested by successfully duplicating the results of Nagy and Sanchez. A second experiment was aimed at an evaluation of the model's performance against the observed continuum of search slopes for feature-conjunction searches of varying difficulty. The Motion Model was tested against two experiments dealing with searches in the visual motion domain. A simple odd-man-out search for counter-clockwise rotating octagons among identical clockwise rotating octagons produced linear increase in search time with the increase of set size. The second experiment was similar to one described by Thorton and Gilden. The results from both implementations agreed with the psychophysical data from the simulated experiments. We conclude that ST provides a valid explanatory mechanism for human covert visual search performance, an explanation going far beyond the conventional saliency map based explanations.

Deep Hierarchies in the Primate Visual Cortex: What Can We Learn for Computer Vision?

“…It is influenced both by reflexive, signal-driven and by intentional, cognitivelydriven attentional mechanisms, and involves the entire visual hierarchy. Attention models compute where to fixate [ 135], [142] and some work even addresses learning to control gaze, e.g., to minimize tracking uncertainty [ 6]. However, in computer vision cognitively-driven attentional mechanisms …”

Color Improves Speed of Processing But Not Perception in a Motion Illusion

“…We activated bottom-up attentional mechanisms by the use of color segmentation cues and also added the top-down attentional demand of linking each direction to the color of the surface. Note that bottom-up attention is not as often studied with regard to consciousness as it requires comparison between conditions that have different physical stimulus properties, whereas top-down attention can be allocated differently to the same visual scene, either as spatial (Jonides, 1981; Egeth and Yantis, 1997; Driver, 2001; Rodriguez-Sanchez et al, 2007; Tsotsos, 2011), feature-based (Treue and Martinez-Trujillo, 1999; Saenz et al, 2002; Tsotsos, 2011), or object-based attention (Valdes-Sosa et al, 1998, 2000; O’Craven et al, 1999; Fallah et al, 2007). Bottom-up attention is therefore expected to be linked with conscious perception, which is likely why the addition of speed or spatial frequency differences attenuate direction repulsion (Marshak and Sekuler, 1979; Kim and Wilson, 1996; Curran and Benton, 2003).…”

Saving Time for Object Finding with a Mobile Manipulator Robot in 3-D Environment

“…Several authors have proposed methods for looking for one or several objects with robots, e.g [2,12,17].…”

“…However, the proposed approach does not deal at all with obstacles in the environment that produce motion and visibility obstructions. In [17], an approach for visual search of a given target is proposed. This approach optimizes the probability of finding the target given a fixed cost limit in terms of total number of robotic actions the robot requires to find a visual target.…”