2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(02)00002-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attention and time estimation in 5- and 8-year-old children: a dual-task procedure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
44
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
7
44
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, children's sensitivity to time appears to be lower for visual signals than for auditory signals, and this difference in the sensitivity to time between these two modalities decreases with age. Developmental studies have indicated that the lower sensitivity to time in young children was due mainly to their limited attention capacities (e.g., Droit-Volet, 2003, 2011Gautier & Droit-Volet, 2002a, 2002bZélanti & Droit-Volet, 2011). Therefore, we can suggest that the lower temporal sensitivity for visual signals than for auditory signals, which is more marked in young children, was in great part related to the heavy attentional demands on timing of visual stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In addition, children's sensitivity to time appears to be lower for visual signals than for auditory signals, and this difference in the sensitivity to time between these two modalities decreases with age. Developmental studies have indicated that the lower sensitivity to time in young children was due mainly to their limited attention capacities (e.g., Droit-Volet, 2003, 2011Gautier & Droit-Volet, 2002a, 2002bZélanti & Droit-Volet, 2011). Therefore, we can suggest that the lower temporal sensitivity for visual signals than for auditory signals, which is more marked in young children, was in great part related to the heavy attentional demands on timing of visual stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In turn this will reduce subjective delay . The timing literature suggests that time is extremely plastic and is altered, for instance, when attention is directed to or captured by non-temporal stimulation (Gautier and Droit-Volet, 2002a;2002b;Brown, 1997), or when such stimulation is elicited from the environment by activity (Sonuga-Barke, 1994;2003). According to the DAv model in ADHD these behaviours are reinforced by the reduction of subjective delay and are manifest as distractibility/inattention and in the latter case as hyperactive fidgeting (with a focus on behavior): Both of which would be predicted to increase with time on task.…”
Section: Delay Aversion and State Regulation Deficits; Theoretical Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to our knowledge, the extent to which children's limited memory capacity affects time estimation in dualtask conditions similar to those used in adult research has never been examined. Arlin (1986aArlin ( , 1986b and more recently Gautier and Droit-Volet (2002) are the only researchers to have examined young children's time estimation in classic dual-task conditions. These authors asked 5-and 8-year-olds to reproduce a 6-or 12-s stimulus duration in either a single-task condition or a dual-task condition with a secondary task that consisted of naming a series of pictures presented at regular intervals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%