Attending to our conceptualisations of race and racism in the pursuit of antiracism: A critical interpretative synthesis of the nursing literature

Abstract

Race and racism are matters of urgent concern for the international nursing community. Recent global events have presented the discipline with an opportunity to generate and sustain long overdue discussions. However, with this opportunity comes a need to consciously attend to what we mean by race and racism, especially in the context of the nursing literature. Indeed, the development of antiracism depends on how we conceptualise race and racism; it is these conceptualisations that actively shape the scope and priorities of antiracist organising and action. The aim of this critical interpretative synthesis (CIS) is to examine conceptualisations of race and racism in the nursing literature by drawing on contemporary race scholarship. The synthesis of diverse literature is enabled through the explorative and expansive process of the CIS method. This review generates three synthesising arguments-a problem 'of' not 'for'; conceptual inconsistencies and drift; and reliance on the lens of experience-that both critique and contribute to the nursing literature. In the pursuit of antiracism, this article urges us to pay close attention to our conceptualisations of race and racism by illuminating the pitfalls that occur when our conceptualisations are inconsistent, contradictory, or simply neglected.

Entanglements, shadows, and dissonance: Formations of socio-political knowing in nursing. A critical inquiry.

“…In nursing, ins tu onal racism is o en minimised due to a focus on individual micro aggressions or personal racism, and a lack of conceptualisa on despite the iden fica on of structural factors (Collier-Sewell, 2023), and the con nua on of dominant Eurocentric worldviews (Blanchet Garneau et al, 2017;Iheduru-Anderson & Waite, 2022). Importantly de facto 17 discrimina on o en perpetuates system level policies and prac ces that disadvantage social groups, and these are o en invisible (Krieger, 2014).…”