2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08751-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attending guidance advised: educational quality of surgical videos on YouTube

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One study characterized only half of the videos as “good,” 25 while others have shown that the most-viewed videos consistently demonstrate concerning maneuvers or fail to achieve the Critical View of Safety (CVS). 17,18 Videos of the laparoscopic appendectomy are also described as being of low quality, with attending evaluations showing low overall utility and lack of standard quality. 16 Studies across multiple surgical specialties have repeatedly demonstrated that, among videos selected for analysis, the quality varies greatly and is rarely correlated with the number of views a video has.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One study characterized only half of the videos as “good,” 25 while others have shown that the most-viewed videos consistently demonstrate concerning maneuvers or fail to achieve the Critical View of Safety (CVS). 17,18 Videos of the laparoscopic appendectomy are also described as being of low quality, with attending evaluations showing low overall utility and lack of standard quality. 16 Studies across multiple surgical specialties have repeatedly demonstrated that, among videos selected for analysis, the quality varies greatly and is rarely correlated with the number of views a video has.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, many studies focus on elective laparoscopic and endoscopic procedures, which benefit from having a variety of validated tools developed to assess quality. 9,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18] These include the GOALS score, 13 visual analog scales for case difficulty (VAS-CD) and operator competence (VAS-OC), 13 and LAP-VEGas practice guidelines. 19 Many of the factors measured in these assessments are inherent to laparoscopic procedures, and cannot be used to evaluate emergency surgeries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is based on outcome measures such as trainee satisfaction gauged by participant questionnaires and improved operative performance [ 23 – 25 ]. Such findings suggest a high-quality and standardised video library is valuable to current trainees, with research showing public video-sharing platforms such as YouTube to be the most popular resource for case preparation [ 26 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies examining content on YouTube, the most common source for surgical videos, report substantial variability in educational value due to nonuniform production quality, unclear intent (education or marketing), lack of a peer-review process, and many times suboptimal techniques and maneuvers. [33][34][35] The learning method using instructional videos has shown to be less effective than hand-on learning using a simulator for microsurgery training, especially in understanding the procedure. However, traditional video instruction can increase the effectiveness of the training curriculum for novices when videos follow recommendations such as the LAP-VEGaS practice guidelines for surgical educational videos.…”
Section: Videos and Websitesmentioning
confidence: 99%