2001
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attempts to detect retrotransposition and de novo deletion of Alus and other dispersed repeats at specific loci in the human genome

Abstract: Dispersed repeat elements contribute to genome instability by de novo insertion and unequal recombination between repeats. To study the dynamics of these processes, we have developed single DNA molecule approaches to detect de novo insertions at a single locus and Alu-mediated deletions at two different loci in human genomic DNA. Validation experiments showed these approaches could detect insertions and deletions at frequencies below 10 76 per cell. However, bulk analysis of germline (sperm) and somatic DNA sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two deletion patterns detected in a single sarcoma cannot possibly correspond to independent events that occurred initially in different cells and were followed by separate clonal growth because the incidence of deletions is extremely low. From preliminary PCR-based experiments (not shown), we roughly estimate that the frequency of occurrence of deletion events, which could vary between tissue types, is lower than 1 per million cells, consistent with previous reports (Seperack et al, 1988;Hollies et al, 2001). We think, therefore, that our observations are most compatible with the interpretation that precise excisions occur first and are followed by secondary microdeletions during tumor evolution.…”
Section: Cre-independent Excision Of Floxed Dna In Micesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The two deletion patterns detected in a single sarcoma cannot possibly correspond to independent events that occurred initially in different cells and were followed by separate clonal growth because the incidence of deletions is extremely low. From preliminary PCR-based experiments (not shown), we roughly estimate that the frequency of occurrence of deletion events, which could vary between tissue types, is lower than 1 per million cells, consistent with previous reports (Seperack et al, 1988;Hollies et al, 2001). We think, therefore, that our observations are most compatible with the interpretation that precise excisions occur first and are followed by secondary microdeletions during tumor evolution.…”
Section: Cre-independent Excision Of Floxed Dna In Micesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It has also been shown that the frequency of Alu ‐mediated deletions in undamaged DNA is relatively low, with deletion rates in sperm of 3 × 10 −7 and 7 × 10 −7 and maximum frequencies of somatic mutation of less than 10 −6 per cell (Hollies et al, 2001). It seems that chromosomal DNA breaks may be necessary inducers of recombination and therefore increase the frequency of HR (Rouet et al, 1994) and chromosomal rearrangements.…”
Section: Influence Of Chromatin Structure and Repeat‐mediated Rearranmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, techniques of sperm small-pool PCR (SP-PCR) could be used to detect de novo conversion events [13]; however, homogenization could occur at many possible sites within most paralogous repeats, making detection problematic. An alternative to these lab-based methods is to use available sequence data to explore whether gene conversion processes have played a role in the evolution of these repeats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%